IDEF vs. METL
IDEF (iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF) and METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDEF is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by iShares, while METL is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Sprott. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDEF charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for METL.
Performance
IDEF vs. METL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDEF achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than METL's 18.34% return.
IDEF
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 21.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METL
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 18.34%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDEF vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IDEF iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF | 4.74% | 3.86% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 18.34% | 27.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDEF and METL is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDEF vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank
IDEF
METL
IDEF vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF (IDEF) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDEF | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDEF | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 1.72 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
IDEF vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDEF drawdown since its inception was -14.63%, smaller than the maximum METL drawdown of -27.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEF and METL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDEF | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.63% | -27.39% | +12.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.31% | -10.27% | -2.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -8.11% | +4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.61% | — | — |
Volatility
IDEF vs. METL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDEF | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.15% | 43.94% | -22.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 43.94% | -22.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 43.94% | -22.87% |
IDEF vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDEF has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDEF vs. METL - Dividend Comparison
IDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than METL's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IDEF iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF | 0.16% | 0.17% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 0.84% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDEF and METL have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDEF is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDEF is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
METL has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.16% for IDEF.
IDEF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while METL is Commodity Producers Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IDEF and 0.89% for METL.
Find the right allocation for IDEF and METL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer