IDEF vs. XAR
IDEF (iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF) and XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds. IDEF is actively managed, while XAR is passively managed. Over the past year, IDEF returned 16.11% vs 37.38% for XAR. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IDEF charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAR.
Performance
IDEF vs. XAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDEF achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than XAR's 14.20% return.
IDEF
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- 16.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAR
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- 37.38%
- 3Y*
- 33.41%
- 5Y*
- 16.10%
- 10Y*
- 18.43%
IDEF vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IDEF iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF | 2.45% | 21.50% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 14.20% | 28.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDEF and XAR is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2025 | 0.89 |
The correlation between IDEF and XAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDEF vs. XAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDEF
XAR
Industrials
Technology
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
IDEF
XAR
Technology
IDEF
XAR
Energy
IDEF
XAR
-
Basic Materials
IDEF
XAR
-
Utilities
IDEF
XAR
-
Financial Services
IDEF
XAR
-
Communication Services
IDEF
XAR
-
Consumer Cyclical
IDEF
-
XAR
-
Consumer Defensive
IDEF
-
XAR
-
Healthcare
IDEF
-
XAR
-
Real Estate
IDEF
-
XAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDEF vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank
IDEF
XAR
IDEF vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF (IDEF) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDEF | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.23 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 2.18 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 6.08 | -3.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDEF vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDEF drawdown since its inception was -14.78%, smaller than the maximum XAR drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEF and XAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDEF | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.78% | -46.37% | +31.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.78% | -17.22% | +2.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.23% | -5.89% | -8.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -6.78% | +2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.28% | 6.16% | +0.12% |
Volatility
IDEF vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF (IDEF) is 8.84%, while SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a volatility of 10.65%. This indicates that IDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDEF | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.84% | 10.65% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.93% | 23.46% | -4.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.10% | 27.98% | -5.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 23.69% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 24.74% | -3.17% |
IDEF vs. XAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDEF has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XAR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDEF vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison
IDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than XAR's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDEF iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF | 0.34% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.29% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDEF and XAR have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAR has higher volatility (10.65%) compared to IDEF (8.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEF dropped -14.78% vs XAR's -46.37%.
On 1-year performance, XAR leads with 37.38% vs 16.11% for IDEF. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IDEF has been the lower-risk option at 8.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XAR has performed better with a 37.38% return vs 16.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IDEF.
IDEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.29% for XAR.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IDEF and 0.35% for XAR.
XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDEF and XAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer