PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDEF vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDEF vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF (IDEF) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDEF achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 43.86% return.


IDEF

1D
-1.24%
1M
-5.02%
YTD
1.18%
6M
-1.01%
1Y
14.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNO

1D
-4.23%
1M
-25.93%
YTD
43.86%
6M
41.93%
1Y
39.47%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
10.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDEF vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IDEF and BNO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2025

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDEF vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDEF
IDEF Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
IDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDEF vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF (IDEF) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDEFBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.20

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

1.23

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.34

4.18

-1.84

IDEF vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDEF and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDEF vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDEF drawdown since its inception was -15.29%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEF and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDEFBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.29%

-87.06%

+71.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.29%

-32.25%

+16.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.29%

-32.25%

+16.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-40.10%

+35.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.36%

9.47%

-3.11%

Volatility

IDEF vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF (IDEF) is 8.82%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 11.33%. This indicates that IDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDEFBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.82%

11.33%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.84%

37.57%

-18.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.11%

41.20%

-19.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.57%

35.70%

-14.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

36.70%

-15.13%

IDEF vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDEF has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDEF vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

IDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


IDEF and BNO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (11.33%) compared to IDEF (8.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEF dropped -15.29% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 39.47% vs 14.84% for IDEF. On fees, IDEF is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, IDEF has been the lower-risk option at 8.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 39.47% return vs 14.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDEF is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

IDEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

IDEF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: iShares and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IDEF and 1.00% for BNO.

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDEF and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer