IDAP.L vs. CP9U.L
IDAP.L (iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS) and CP9U.L (Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IDAP.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD while CP9U.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDAP.L returned 9.72%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for CP9U.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDAP.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CP9U.L.
Performance
IDAP.L vs. CP9U.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDAP.L achieves a 12.85% return, which is significantly higher than CP9U.L's 1.91% return.
IDAP.L
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 12.85%
- 6M
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- 38.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.67%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
CP9U.L
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -4.41%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 3.21%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- —
IDAP.L vs. CP9U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDAP.L iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS | 12.85% | 29.69% | 6.18% | 13.48% | -1.96% | 3.39% | -9.38% | 9.11% |
CP9U.L Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR | 1.91% | 12.86% | -0.05% | 5.20% | -12.47% | 7.60% | 1.98% | 8.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDAP.L and CP9U.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2019 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, IDAP.L and CP9U.L have become more correlated (0.81) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.
IDAP.L vs. CP9U.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDAP.L
CP9U.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Communication Services
Utilities
Healthcare
Technology
Financial Services
IDAP.L
CP9U.L
Basic Materials
IDAP.L
CP9U.L
Consumer Cyclical
IDAP.L
CP9U.L
Real Estate
IDAP.L
CP9U.L
Industrials
IDAP.L
CP9U.L
Consumer Defensive
IDAP.L
CP9U.L
Energy
IDAP.L
CP9U.L
-
Communication Services
IDAP.L
CP9U.L
Utilities
IDAP.L
CP9U.L
Healthcare
IDAP.L
CP9U.L
Technology
IDAP.L
CP9U.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDAP.L vs. CP9U.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDAP.L
CP9U.L
IDAP.L vs. CP9U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IDAP.L) and Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDAP.L | CP9U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.05 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | 0.37 | +3.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.72 | 1.01 | +15.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDAP.L | CP9U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.95 | 0.23 | +2.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.06 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.27 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
IDAP.L vs. CP9U.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDAP.L drawdown since its inception was -69.37%, which is greater than CP9U.L's maximum drawdown of -38.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDAP.L and CP9U.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDAP.L | CP9U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.37% | -38.03% | -31.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.77% | -8.58% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.62% | -19.04% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.37% | -25.90% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | -6.97% | +3.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.15% | -7.24% | -3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 3.18% | -0.90% |
Volatility
IDAP.L vs. CP9U.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IDAP.L) is 4.29%, while Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9U.L) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that IDAP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CP9U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDAP.L | CP9U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 4.56% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.41% | 11.21% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.92% | 13.92% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.81% | 21.99% | -7.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 27.12% | -10.39% |
IDAP.L vs. CP9U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDAP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CP9U.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDAP.L vs. CP9U.L - Dividend Comparison
IDAP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, while CP9U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CP9U.L Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDAP.L iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS | 3.65% | 4.22% | 5.36% | 5.72% | 6.92% | 5.59% | 3.49% | 5.52% | 6.04% | 4.55% | 4.54% | 5.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDAP.L and CP9U.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CP9U.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CP9U.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IDAP.L.
IDAP.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD, while CP9U.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IDAP.L and 0.35% for CP9U.L.
Find the right allocation for IDAP.L and CP9U.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer