PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDAP.L vs. SEDY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IDAP.L vs. SEDY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IDAP.L) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IDAP.L vs. SEDY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDAP.L
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS
10.63%29.69%6.18%13.48%-1.96%3.39%-9.38%13.90%-15.23%17.00%
SEDY.L
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF
10.59%27.65%6.90%18.97%-30.91%11.62%-2.97%14.87%-5.42%25.64%
Different Trading Currencies

IDAP.L is traded in USD, while SEDY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SEDY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IDAP.L having a 10.63% return and SEDY.L slightly lower at 10.59%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IDAP.L having a 7.48% annualized return and SEDY.L not far behind at 7.41%.


IDAP.L

1D
2.28%
1M
-3.26%
YTD
10.63%
6M
18.09%
1Y
42.35%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
7.48%

SEDY.L

1D
1.61%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
10.59%
6M
17.89%
1Y
32.52%
3Y*
20.99%
5Y*
5.56%
10Y*
7.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IDAP.L vs. SEDY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDAP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than SEDY.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IDAP.L vs. SEDY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDAP.L
IDAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IDAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IDAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

SEDY.L
SEDY.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SEDY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEDY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEDY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SEDY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEDY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDAP.L vs. SEDY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IDAP.L) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDAP.LSEDY.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.73

2.12

+0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.29

2.70

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.40

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

3.19

+0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.35

14.22

+3.12

IDAP.L vs. SEDY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDAP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the SEDY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDAP.L and SEDY.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDAP.LSEDY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.12

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.33

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.42

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.22

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between IDAP.L and SEDY.L is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IDAP.L vs. SEDY.L - Dividend Comparison

IDAP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than SEDY.L's 5.23% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDAP.L
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS
3.72%4.22%5.36%5.72%6.92%5.59%3.49%5.52%6.04%4.55%4.54%5.47%
SEDY.L
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF
5.23%5.72%7.74%7.98%9.33%6.41%5.11%5.84%5.54%4.08%4.25%6.31%

Drawdowns

IDAP.L vs. SEDY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDAP.L drawdown since its inception was -69.37%, which is greater than SEDY.L's maximum drawdown of -48.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDAP.L and SEDY.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IDAP.LSEDY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.37%

-43.56%

-25.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-10.60%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.99%

-29.66%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.71%

-30.39%

-15.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.92%

-1.59%

-3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.25%

-12.28%

+1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

1.99%

+0.49%

Volatility

IDAP.L vs. SEDY.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IDAP.L) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L) have volatilities of 5.96% and 5.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IDAP.LSEDY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

5.69%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

10.05%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.50%

15.32%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.70%

16.92%

-2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.76%

17.57%

-0.81%