IDAP.L vs. HYGW
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IDAP.L) and iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW).
IDAP.L and HYGW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IDAP.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. It was launched on Jun 2, 2006. HYGW is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cboe HYG BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Aug 18, 2022. Both IDAP.L and HYGW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IDAP.L vs. HYGW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IDAP.L vs. HYGW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDAP.L iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS | 10.63% | 29.69% | 6.18% | 13.48% | 2.59% |
HYGW iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 0.33% | 6.19% | 6.99% | 7.31% | -0.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDAP.L achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly higher than HYGW's 0.33% return.
IDAP.L
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 18.09%
- 1Y
- 42.35%
- 3Y*
- 19.42%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
HYGW
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 5.44%
- 3Y*
- 5.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IDAP.L vs. HYGW - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDAP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGW's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IDAP.L vs. HYGW — Risk / Return Rank
IDAP.L
HYGW
IDAP.L vs. HYGW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IDAP.L) and iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDAP.L | HYGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.73 | 1.29 | +1.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.29 | 1.77 | +1.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.31 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | 1.80 | +2.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.35 | 9.49 | +7.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDAP.L | HYGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 1.29 | +1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 1.20 | -0.97 |
Correlation
The correlation between IDAP.L and HYGW is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IDAP.L vs. HYGW - Dividend Comparison
IDAP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than HYGW's 12.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDAP.L iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS | 3.72% | 4.22% | 5.36% | 5.72% | 6.92% | 5.59% | 3.49% | 5.52% | 6.04% | 4.55% | 4.54% | 5.47% |
HYGW iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 12.21% | 12.53% | 12.30% | 15.98% | 8.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IDAP.L vs. HYGW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDAP.L drawdown since its inception was -69.37%, which is greater than HYGW's maximum drawdown of -5.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDAP.L and HYGW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDAP.L | HYGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.37% | -5.49% | -63.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.41% | -3.23% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.92% | -0.74% | -4.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.25% | -0.63% | -10.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 0.61% | +1.87% |
Volatility
IDAP.L vs. HYGW - Volatility Comparison
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IDAP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) at 1.69%. This indicates that IDAP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYGW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IDAP.L | HYGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 1.69% | +4.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 2.38% | +7.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.50% | 4.27% | +11.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 4.76% | +9.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 4.76% | +12.00% |