PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CP9U.L vs. LAUU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CP9U.L vs. LAUU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9U.L) and Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist (LAUU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CP9U.L vs. LAUU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CP9U.L
Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR
2.60%12.86%-0.05%5.20%-12.47%7.60%1.98%8.52%
LAUU.L
Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist
4.68%17.36%1.39%11.94%-7.97%8.38%11.35%8.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CP9U.L achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly lower than LAUU.L's 4.68% return.


CP9U.L

1D
2.87%
1M
-4.18%
YTD
2.60%
6M
1.53%
1Y
14.35%
3Y*
5.82%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*

LAUU.L

1D
3.21%
1M
-6.08%
YTD
4.68%
6M
3.96%
1Y
23.33%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CP9U.L vs. LAUU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CP9U.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LAUU.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CP9U.L vs. LAUU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CP9U.L
CP9U.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CP9U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CP9U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CP9U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CP9U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CP9U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

LAUU.L
LAUU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LAUU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAUU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAUU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
LAUU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAUU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CP9U.L vs. LAUU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9U.L) and Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist (LAUU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CP9U.LLAUU.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

1.20

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

1.65

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.26

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

1.84

-0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.60

6.91

-1.31

CP9U.L vs. LAUU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CP9U.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the LAUU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CP9U.L and LAUU.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CP9U.LLAUU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

1.20

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.31

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.30

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between CP9U.L and LAUU.L is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CP9U.L vs. LAUU.L - Dividend Comparison

CP9U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LAUU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CP9U.L
Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LAUU.L
Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist
2.48%2.60%3.90%3.13%4.48%2.86%1.94%3.50%3.96%

Drawdowns

CP9U.L vs. LAUU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CP9U.L drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, smaller than the maximum LAUU.L drawdown of -45.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CP9U.L and LAUU.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CP9U.LLAUU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.03%

-45.03%

+7.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.30%

-13.62%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.90%

-25.38%

-0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.35%

-7.30%

+1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-7.23%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

3.39%

-0.45%

Volatility

CP9U.L vs. LAUU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9U.L) is 5.99%, while Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist (LAUU.L) has a volatility of 6.88%. This indicates that CP9U.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAUU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CP9U.LLAUU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

6.88%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

11.53%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.58%

19.50%

-2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.17%

19.64%

+2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.53%

22.18%

+5.35%