ICVT vs. CSPF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ICVT (iShares Convertible Bond ETF) and CSPF (Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. ICVT is passively managed, while CSPF is actively managed. Over the past year, ICVT returned 42.20% vs 9.14% for CSPF. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICVT charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CSPF.

Performance

ICVT vs. CSPF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) and Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICVT achieves a 25.28% return, which is significantly higher than CSPF's 2.65% return.

ICVT

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 7.16%
• YTD: 25.28%
• 6M: 24.31%
• 1Y: 42.20%
• 3Y*: 21.04%
• 5Y*: 7.79%
• 10Y*: 13.99%

CSPF

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 2.65%
• 6M: 2.72%
• 1Y: 9.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICVT vs. CSPF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF	25.28%	14.16%
CSPF Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF	2.65%	8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ICVT and CSPF is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

ICVT vs. CSPF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICVT

ICVT Risk / Return Rank: 87
ICVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ICVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
ICVT Omega Ratio Rank: 84
ICVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
ICVT Martin Ratio Rank: 89

CSPF

CSPF Risk / Return Rank: 71
CSPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
CSPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
CSPF Omega Ratio Rank: 76
CSPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CSPF Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICVT vs. CSPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) and Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ICVT	CSPF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.95	2.26	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.84	3.25	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.45	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.62	3.00	+2.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.48	13.63	+6.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ICVT vs. CSPF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICVT Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the CSPF Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICVT and CSPF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ICVT	CSPF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.95	2.26	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	1.96	-1.18

Drawdowns

ICVT vs. CSPF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICVT drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, which is greater than CSPF's maximum drawdown of -3.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICVT and CSPF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICVT	CSPF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.25%	-3.06%	-30.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.55%	-3.06%	-4.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-0.32%	-0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.50%	-0.44%	-9.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	0.67%	+1.40%

Volatility

ICVT vs. CSPF - Volatility Comparison

iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF) at 1.08%. This indicates that ICVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICVT	CSPF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.53%	1.08%	+4.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.69%	3.03%	+8.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.36%	4.07%	+10.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.23%	4.17%	+9.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.50%	4.17%	+11.33%

ICVT vs. CSPF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICVT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CSPF's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICVT vs. CSPF - Dividend Comparison

ICVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than CSPF's 5.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSPF Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF	5.16%	4.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF	1.30%	1.73%	2.19%	1.85%	1.93%	7.70%	3.98%	1.86%	4.82%	2.56%	3.06%	1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICVT and CSPF in my portfolio?

ICVT and CSPF have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICVT or CSPF?

ICVT has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to CSPF (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICVT dropped -33.25% vs CSPF's -3.06%.

Which ETF is better, ICVT or CSPF?

On 1-year performance, ICVT leads with 42.20% vs 9.14% for CSPF. On fees, ICVT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSPF has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ICVT or CSPF?

Over the 1-year period, ICVT has performed better with a 42.20% return vs 9.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICVT or CSPF?

ICVT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CSPF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ICVT or CSPF?

CSPF has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 1.30% for ICVT.

What is the main difference between ICVT and CSPF?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Cohen & Steers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ICVT and 0.59% for CSPF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.