ICRC vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ICRC (Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICRC is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Bitwise, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. ICRC is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICRC charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

ICRC vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF (ICRC) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICRC achieves a -4.96% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.

ICRC

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: -15.52%
• YTD: -4.96%
• 6M: -8.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 9.91%
• 1Y: 23.70%
• 3Y*: 13.76%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 9.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICRC vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ICRC Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF	-4.96%	-36.21%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.88%	6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ICRC and QYLD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

ICRC vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 89
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICRC vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF (ICRC) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ICRC	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.79	0.59	-1.38

Drawdowns

ICRC vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICRC drawdown since its inception was -55.65%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICRC and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICRC	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.65%	-24.75%	-30.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.97%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.78%	-0.06%	-40.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.52%	-3.84%	-28.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ICRC	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.84%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.40%	8.57%	+58.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.40%	14.70%	+52.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.40%	15.49%	+51.91%

ICRC vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICRC has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICRC vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

ICRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.44%, more than QYLD's 11.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ICRC Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF	42.44%	17.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.46%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICRC and QYLD in my portfolio?

ICRC and QYLD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ICRC or QYLD?

On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICRC or QYLD?

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ICRC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ICRC or QYLD?

ICRC has the higher dividend yield at 42.44%, compared with 11.46% for QYLD.

What is the main difference between ICRC and QYLD?

ICRC is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ICRC and 0.60% for QYLD.