ICRC vs. IPDP
ICRC (Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. ICRC charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.
Performance
ICRC vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ICRC
- 1D
- -5.84%
- 1M
- -17.98%
- 6M
- -28.19%
- YTD
- -29.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPDP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICRC vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ICRC Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF | -0.50% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICRC vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF (ICRC) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICRC vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICRC | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.87% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.84% | — | — |
Volatility
ICRC vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICRC | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.27% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.27% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.27% | — | — |
ICRC vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICRC has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICRC vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison
ICRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 60.19%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ICRC Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF | 60.19% | 17.79% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ICRC is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICRC is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.
ICRC has the higher dividend yield at 60.19%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.
They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ICRC and 1.52% for IPDP.
Find the right allocation for ICRC and IPDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer