PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICRC vs. IETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICRC vs. IETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF (ICRC) and Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF (IETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICRC achieves a -5.38% return, which is significantly higher than IETH's -34.74% return.


ICRC

1D
-8.76%
1M
-16.63%
YTD
-5.38%
6M
-7.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IETH

1D
-1.39%
1M
-20.40%
YTD
-34.74%
6M
-36.49%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICRC vs. IETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ICRC and IETH is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICRC vs. IETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF (ICRC) and Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF (IETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ICRC vs. IETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICRCIETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.79

-1.15

+0.35

Drawdowns

ICRC vs. IETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICRC drawdown since its inception was -55.65%, roughly equal to the maximum IETH drawdown of -55.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICRC and IETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICRCIETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.65%

-55.94%

+0.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.04%

-54.89%

+13.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.47%

-37.21%

+4.74%

Volatility

ICRC vs. IETH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICRCIETHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.59%

59.62%

+7.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.59%

59.62%

+7.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.59%

59.62%

+7.97%

ICRC vs. IETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICRC has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than IETH's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICRC vs. IETH - Dividend Comparison

ICRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.62%, less than IETH's 47.65% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ICRC and IETH have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IETH is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IETH is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ICRC.

IETH has the higher dividend yield at 47.65%, compared with 42.62% for ICRC.

Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ICRC and 0.97% for IETH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICRC and IETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer