ICPY vs. FLSP

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ICPY (Tweedy, Browne International Insider + Value ETF) and FLSP (Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICPY is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Tweedy, Browne, while FLSP is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICPY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FLSP.

Performance

ICPY vs. FLSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tweedy, Browne International Insider + Value ETF (ICPY) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICPY achieves a 17.30% return, which is significantly higher than FLSP's 2.56% return.

ICPY

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 2.06%
• 6M: 13.08%
• YTD: 17.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLSP

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 1.77%
• YTD: 2.56%
• 1Y: 17.53%
• 3Y*: 9.67%
• 5Y*: 8.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICPY vs. FLSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ICPY Tweedy, Browne International Insider + Value ETF	17.30%	13.79%
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF	2.56%	8.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ICPY and FLSP is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025	0.05

Return for Risk

ICPY vs. FLSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICPY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FLSP

FLSP Risk / Return Rank: 82
FLSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FLSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FLSP Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FLSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FLSP Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICPY vs. FLSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tweedy, Browne International Insider + Value ETF (ICPY) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ICPY	FLSP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.00	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.89	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.37	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.07	—

Drawdowns

ICPY vs. FLSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICPY drawdown since its inception was -8.86%, smaller than the maximum FLSP drawdown of -22.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICPY and FLSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICPY	FLSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.86%	-22.75%	+13.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.69%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.68%	+0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-6.20%	+4.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.34%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ICPY	FLSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.52%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.74%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.77%	8.79%	+5.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.77%	13.37%	+1.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.77%	13.44%	+1.33%

ICPY vs. FLSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICPY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FLSP's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICPY vs. FLSP - Dividend Comparison

ICPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than FLSP's 2.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF	2.58%	2.65%	1.18%	1.19%	2.18%	1.19%	8.08%
ICPY Tweedy, Browne International Insider + Value ETF	3.89%	4.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICPY and FLSP in my portfolio?

ICPY and FLSP have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ICPY or FLSP?

On fees, FLSP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICPY or FLSP?

FLSP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ICPY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ICPY or FLSP?

ICPY has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 2.58% for FLSP.

What is the main difference between ICPY and FLSP?

ICPY is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FLSP is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Tweedy, Browne and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ICPY and 0.65% for FLSP.