ICOP vs. SLVR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ICOP (iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF) and SLVR (Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICOP is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index, while SLVR is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners™ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ICOP returned 102.60% vs 118.11% for SLVR. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICOP charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SLVR.

Performance

ICOP vs. SLVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICOP achieves a 27.29% return, which is significantly higher than SLVR's 6.80% return.

ICOP

• 1D: -3.29%
• 1M: 17.09%
• YTD: 27.29%
• 6M: 37.08%
• 1Y: 102.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLVR

• 1D: -5.47%
• 1M: 1.96%
• YTD: 6.80%
• 6M: 18.93%
• 1Y: 118.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICOP vs. SLVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF	27.29%	70.53%
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF	6.80%	170.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ICOP and SLVR is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025	0.68

The correlation between ICOP and SLVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ICOP vs. SLVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICOP

ICOP Risk / Return Rank: 74
ICOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
ICOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
ICOP Omega Ratio Rank: 68
ICOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
ICOP Martin Ratio Rank: 75

SLVR

SLVR Risk / Return Rank: 51
SLVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SLVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SLVR Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SLVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SLVR Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICOP vs. SLVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ICOP	SLVR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.77	1.93	+0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	2.25	+0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.31	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.95	3.08	+0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.50	7.66	+6.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ICOP vs. SLVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICOP Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the SLVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICOP and SLVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ICOP	SLVR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.77	1.93	+0.84
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.08	2.02	-0.94

Drawdowns

ICOP vs. SLVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICOP drawdown since its inception was -38.67%, roughly equal to the maximum SLVR drawdown of -38.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOP and SLVR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICOP	SLVR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.67%	-38.60%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.13%	-38.60%	+12.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.29%	-28.51%	+25.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.67%	-9.24%	-2.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.10%	15.47%	-8.37%

Volatility

ICOP vs. SLVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) is 13.69%, while Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) has a volatility of 19.31%. This indicates that ICOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICOP	SLVR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.69%	19.31%	-5.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.28%	51.02%	-18.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.29%	61.64%	-24.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.77%	57.85%	-24.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.77%	57.85%	-24.08%

ICOP vs. SLVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICOP has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVR's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICOP vs. SLVR - Dividend Comparison

ICOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than SLVR's 3.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF	1.63%	2.08%	1.87%	2.15%
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF	3.45%	3.68%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICOP and SLVR in my portfolio?

ICOP and SLVR have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICOP or SLVR?

SLVR has higher volatility (19.31%) compared to ICOP (13.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOP dropped -38.67% vs SLVR's -38.60%.

Which ETF is better, ICOP or SLVR?

On 1-year performance, SLVR leads with 118.11% vs 102.60% for ICOP. On fees, ICOP is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, ICOP has been the lower-risk option at 13.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ICOP or SLVR?

Over the 1-year period, SLVR has performed better with a 118.11% return vs 102.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICOP or SLVR?

ICOP is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SLVR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ICOP or SLVR?

SLVR has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 1.63% for ICOP.

What is the main difference between ICOP and SLVR?

ICOP is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while SLVR is Silver. ICOP tracks STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index, while SLVR tracks Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners™ Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ICOP and 0.65% for SLVR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.