ICOP vs. IBIT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ICOP (iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICOP is a Copper fund tracking the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ICOP returned 60.49% vs -47.60% for IBIT. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICOP charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.

Performance

ICOP vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICOP achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -29.06% return.

ICOP

• 1D: -2.44%
• 1M: -11.83%
• 6M: -2.13%
• YTD: 7.87%
• 1Y: 60.49%
• 3Y*: 24.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIT

• 1D: -2.79%
• 1M: -2.28%
• 6M: -32.10%
• YTD: -29.06%
• 1Y: -47.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICOP vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF	7.87%	78.01%	4.47%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-29.06%	-6.41%	89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ICOP and IBIT is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.29

Return for Risk

ICOP vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICOP

ICOP Risk / Return Rank: 54
ICOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ICOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
ICOP Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ICOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ICOP Martin Ratio Rank: 54

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 1
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 1
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICOP vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ICOP	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	-1.08	+2.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	-1.65	+3.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	0.82	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	-0.90	+3.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.33	-1.46	+8.79

ICOP vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICOP Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICOP and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ICOP vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICOP drawdown since its inception was -38.67%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOP and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICOP	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.67%	-53.30%	+14.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.13%	-53.30%	+27.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.04%	-50.60%	+32.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.69%	-17.56%	+5.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.27%	32.72%	-24.45%

Volatility

ICOP vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) has a higher volatility of 13.59% compared to iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) at 11.51%. This indicates that ICOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICOP	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.59%	11.51%	+2.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.19%	34.79%	+0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.03%	44.38%	-4.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.50%	49.97%	-15.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.50%	49.97%	-15.47%

ICOP vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICOP has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICOP vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

ICOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF	1.88%	2.08%	1.87%	2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICOP and IBIT in my portfolio?

ICOP and IBIT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICOP or IBIT?

ICOP has higher volatility (13.59%) compared to IBIT (11.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOP dropped -38.67% vs IBIT's -53.30%.

Which ETF is better, ICOP or IBIT?

On 1-year performance, ICOP leads with 60.49% vs -47.60% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IBIT has been the lower-risk option at 11.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ICOP or IBIT?

Over the 1-year period, ICOP has performed better with a 60.49% return vs -47.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICOP or IBIT?

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for ICOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ICOP or IBIT?

ICOP has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

What is the main difference between ICOP and IBIT?

ICOP is categorized as Copper, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. ICOP tracks STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ICOP and 0.25% for IBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.