ICOI vs. XRMI

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ICOI (Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) and XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. ICOI is actively managed, while XRMI is passively managed. Over the past year, ICOI returned -52.90% vs 9.55% for XRMI. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICOI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XRMI.

Performance

ICOI vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICOI achieves a -23.05% return, which is significantly lower than XRMI's 3.15% return.

ICOI

• 1D: -2.19%
• 1M: -0.36%
• 6M: -28.76%
• YTD: -23.05%
• 1Y: -52.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XRMI

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 1.52%
• 6M: 2.46%
• YTD: 3.15%
• 1Y: 9.55%
• 3Y*: 6.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICOI vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ICOI Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	-23.05%	-6.51%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	3.15%	5.99%

Correlation

The correlation between ICOI and XRMI is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

ICOI vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICOI

ICOI Risk / Return Rank: 1
ICOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
ICOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
ICOI Omega Ratio Rank: 1
ICOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
ICOI Martin Ratio Rank: 2

XRMI

XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 61
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 70
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICOI vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ICOI	XRMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.07	1.73	-2.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.65	2.42	-4.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.33	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	1.91	-2.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.30	7.69	-8.99

ICOI vs. XRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICOI Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the XRMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICOI and XRMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ICOI vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICOI drawdown since its inception was -59.32%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOI and XRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICOI	XRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.32%	-15.31%	-44.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.32%	-5.02%	-54.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.71%	-0.23%	-55.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.65%	-5.81%	-23.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.64%	1.24%	+39.40%

Volatility

ICOI vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI) has a higher volatility of 12.91% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 1.41%. This indicates that ICOI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICOI	XRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.91%	1.41%	+11.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.11%	4.41%	+31.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.71%	5.57%	+44.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.99%	6.88%	+43.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.99%	6.88%	+43.11%

ICOI vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICOI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICOI vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

ICOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 294.36%, more than XRMI's 12.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ICOI Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	294.36%	247.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.54%	12.35%	11.86%	12.62%	12.84%	2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICOI and XRMI in my portfolio?

ICOI and XRMI have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICOI or XRMI?

ICOI has higher volatility (12.91%) compared to XRMI (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOI dropped -59.32% vs XRMI's -15.31%.

Which ETF is better, ICOI or XRMI?

On 1-year performance, XRMI leads with 9.55% vs -52.90% for ICOI. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ICOI or XRMI?

Over the 1-year period, XRMI has performed better with a 9.55% return vs -52.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICOI or XRMI?

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ICOI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ICOI or XRMI?

ICOI has the higher dividend yield at 294.36%, compared with 12.54% for XRMI.

What is the main difference between ICOI and XRMI?

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ICOI and 0.60% for XRMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XRMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.