PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICOI vs. HOOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICOI vs. HOOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICOI achieves a -22.33% return, which is significantly higher than HOOW's -34.08% return.


ICOI

1D
-5.88%
1M
-10.04%
YTD
-22.33%
6M
-32.60%
1Y
-42.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOW

1D
-7.51%
1M
8.18%
YTD
-34.08%
6M
-46.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICOI vs. HOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ICOI
Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
-22.33%-28.11%
HOOW
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF
-34.08%46.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ICOI and HOOW is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICOI vs. HOOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICOI
ICOI Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ICOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOI Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICOI vs. HOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICOIHOOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.16

ICOI vs. HOOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICOIHOOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.50

-0.04

-0.46

Drawdowns

ICOI vs. HOOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICOI drawdown since its inception was -58.10%, smaller than the maximum HOOW drawdown of -65.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOI and HOOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICOIHOOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.10%

-65.74%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.30%

-55.23%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.43%

-29.13%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.48%

Volatility

ICOI vs. HOOW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICOIHOOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.40%

83.86%

-34.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.41%

83.86%

-33.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.41%

83.86%

-33.45%

ICOI vs. HOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICOI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than HOOW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICOI vs. HOOW - Dividend Comparison

ICOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 338.05%, more than HOOW's 163.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025
HOOW
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF
163.90%67.92%
ICOI
Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
338.05%247.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICOI and HOOW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ICOI is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ICOI is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HOOW.

ICOI has the higher dividend yield at 338.05%, compared with 163.90% for HOOW.

ICOI is categorized as Derivative Income, while HOOW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ICOI and 0.99% for HOOW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICOI and HOOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer