ICOI vs. HOOW
ICOI (Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) and HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICOI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Bitwise, while HOOW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICOI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for HOOW.
Performance
ICOI vs. HOOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICOI achieves a -22.33% return, which is significantly higher than HOOW's -34.08% return.
ICOI
- 1D
- -5.88%
- 1M
- -10.04%
- YTD
- -22.33%
- 6M
- -32.60%
- 1Y
- -42.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOOW
- 1D
- -7.51%
- 1M
- 8.18%
- YTD
- -34.08%
- 6M
- -46.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICOI vs. HOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ICOI Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | -22.33% | -28.11% |
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | -34.08% | 46.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICOI and HOOW is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICOI vs. HOOW — Risk / Return Rank
ICOI
HOOW
ICOI vs. HOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICOI | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICOI | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.50 | -0.04 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
ICOI vs. HOOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICOI drawdown since its inception was -58.10%, smaller than the maximum HOOW drawdown of -65.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOI and HOOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICOI | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.10% | -65.74% | +7.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.30% | -55.23% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.43% | -29.13% | +1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.48% | — | — |
Volatility
ICOI vs. HOOW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICOI | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.93% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.40% | 83.86% | -34.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.41% | 83.86% | -33.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.41% | 83.86% | -33.45% |
ICOI vs. HOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICOI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than HOOW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICOI vs. HOOW - Dividend Comparison
ICOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 338.05%, more than HOOW's 163.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | 163.90% | 67.92% |
ICOI Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 338.05% | 247.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICOI and HOOW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICOI is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICOI is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HOOW.
ICOI has the higher dividend yield at 338.05%, compared with 163.90% for HOOW.
ICOI is categorized as Derivative Income, while HOOW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ICOI and 0.99% for HOOW.
Find the right allocation for ICOI and HOOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer