ICLN vs. VHYL.L
ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) and VHYL.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both exchange-traded funds - ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while VHYL.L is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ICLN returned 8.88%/yr vs 9.91%/yr for VHYL.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICLN charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for VHYL.L.
Performance
ICLN vs. VHYL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ICLN is traded in USD, while VHYL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VHYL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICLN achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly lower than VHYL.L's 12.87% return. Over the past 10 years, ICLN has underperformed VHYL.L with an annualized return of 8.88%, while VHYL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.91% annualized return.
ICLN
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -14.03%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- 34.98%
- 3Y*
- 0.42%
- 5Y*
- -3.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.76%
VHYL.L
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 10.03%
- YTD
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 11.58%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.35%
ICLN vs. VHYL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 10.70% | 47.05% | -25.72% | -20.41% | -5.43% | -24.18% | 141.82% | 44.36% | -9.03% | 21.47% |
VHYL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 12.87% | 27.15% | 9.37% | 10.81% | -5.37% | 18.15% | -0.58% | 21.69% | -11.88% | 19.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICLN and VHYL.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2013 | 0.47 |
ICLN vs. VHYL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ICLN
VHYL.L
Utilities
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
ICLN
VHYL.L
Technology
ICLN
VHYL.L
Industrials
ICLN
VHYL.L
Energy
ICLN
VHYL.L
Basic Materials
ICLN
VHYL.L
Financial Services
ICLN
VHYL.L
Consumer Cyclical
ICLN
VHYL.L
Communication Services
ICLN
-
VHYL.L
Consumer Defensive
ICLN
-
VHYL.L
Healthcare
ICLN
-
VHYL.L
Real Estate
ICLN
-
VHYL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICLN vs. VHYL.L — Risk / Return Rank
ICLN
VHYL.L
ICLN vs. VHYL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICLN | VHYL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.46 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 3.28 | -1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 11.56 | -6.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICLN vs. VHYL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICLN drawdown since its inception was -87.15%, which is greater than VHYL.L's maximum drawdown of -36.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLN and VHYL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICLN | VHYL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.15% | -36.01% | -51.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.42% | -7.82% | -15.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.27% | -12.59% | -29.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.16% | -21.60% | -35.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.75% | -36.01% | -30.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.47% | -0.62% | -49.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.45% | -5.28% | -61.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.78% | 2.22% | +4.56% |
Volatility
ICLN vs. VHYL.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a higher volatility of 11.54% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L) at 2.10%. This indicates that ICLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICLN | VHYL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.54% | 2.10% | +9.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.70% | 8.34% | +16.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.86% | 10.23% | +19.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.93% | 13.15% | +14.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.43% | 14.40% | +13.03% |
ICLN vs. VHYL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICLN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VHYL.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICLN vs. VHYL.L - Dividend Comparison
ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than VHYL.L's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.02% | 1.63% | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% |
VHYL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 2.53% | 2.79% | 3.08% | 3.37% | 3.67% | 3.08% | 3.28% | 3.34% | 3.63% | 3.09% | 2.88% | 3.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICLN and VHYL.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VHYL.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VHYL.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ICLN.
ICLN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while VHYL.L is Dividend. ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while VHYL.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ICLN and 0.29% for VHYL.L.
Find the right allocation for ICLN and VHYL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer