ICLN vs. ITA
ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) and ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while ITA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ICLN returned 11.67%/yr vs 15.34%/yr for ITA. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICLN charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ITA.
Performance
ICLN vs. ITA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICLN achieves a 27.33% return, which is significantly higher than ITA's 8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, ICLN has underperformed ITA with an annualized return of 11.67%, while ITA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.34% annualized return.
ICLN
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- 27.33%
- 6M
- 27.01%
- 1Y
- 60.20%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- -0.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
ITA
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 8.97%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 27.30%
- 5Y*
- 16.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.34%
ICLN vs. ITA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 27.33% | 47.05% | -25.72% | -20.41% | -5.43% | -24.18% | 141.82% | 44.36% | -9.03% | 21.47% |
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 8.97% | 48.64% | 15.81% | 14.33% | 9.96% | 9.39% | -13.57% | 30.51% | -7.22% | 35.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICLN and ITA is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2008 | 0.53 |
The correlation between ICLN and ITA shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ICLN vs. ITA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ICLN
ITA
Utilities
-
Industrials
Energy
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
ICLN
ITA
-
Industrials
ICLN
ITA
Energy
ICLN
ITA
-
Technology
ICLN
ITA
Basic Materials
ICLN
ITA
-
Consumer Cyclical
ICLN
ITA
-
Communication Services
ICLN
-
ITA
-
Consumer Defensive
ICLN
-
ITA
-
Financial Services
ICLN
-
ITA
-
Healthcare
ICLN
-
ITA
-
Real Estate
ICLN
-
ITA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICLN vs. ITA — Risk / Return Rank
ICLN
ITA
ICLN vs. ITA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICLN | ITA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.25 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | 1.97 | +1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.84 | 5.20 | +8.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICLN vs. ITA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICLN drawdown since its inception was -87.15%, which is greater than ITA's maximum drawdown of -59.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLN and ITA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICLN | ITA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.15% | -59.72% | -27.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.38% | -15.82% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.18% | -15.82% | -27.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.16% | -18.72% | -38.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.75% | -51.00% | -15.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.03% | -6.64% | -36.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.56% | -9.45% | -57.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 5.97% | -1.56% |
Volatility
ICLN vs. ITA - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a higher volatility of 12.97% compared to iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) at 9.07%. This indicates that ICLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICLN | ITA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.97% | 9.07% | +3.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.62% | 18.47% | +4.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.21% | 21.74% | +6.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.55% | 20.21% | +7.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.32% | 23.22% | +4.10% |
ICLN vs. ITA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICLN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ITA's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICLN vs. ITA - Dividend Comparison
ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than ITA's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% |
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.85% | 0.93% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 1.07% | 1.54% | 1.13% | 0.91% | 1.07% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICLN and ITA have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICLN has higher volatility (12.97%) compared to ITA (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICLN dropped -87.15% vs ITA's -59.72%.
On 10-year performance, ITA leads with 15.34% vs 11.67% for ICLN. On fees, ITA is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, ITA has been the lower-risk option at 9.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITA has performed better with a 15.34% return vs 11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITA is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ICLN.
ICLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.46% for ITA.
ICLN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while ITA is Aerospace & Defense. ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while ITA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ICLN and 0.38% for ITA.
ICLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICLN and ITA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer