ICLN vs. ISPY.L
ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) and ISPY.L (L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while ISPY.L is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the ISE Cyber Security UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ICLN returned 8.88%/yr vs 16.97%/yr for ISPY.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICLN charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for ISPY.L.
Performance
ICLN vs. ISPY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ICLN is traded in USD, while ISPY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ISPY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICLN achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly lower than ISPY.L's 44.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ICLN has underperformed ISPY.L with an annualized return of 8.88%, while ISPY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.97% annualized return.
ICLN
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -14.03%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- 34.98%
- 3Y*
- 0.42%
- 5Y*
- -3.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.76%
ISPY.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 13.49%
- 6M
- 50.10%
- YTD
- 44.63%
- 1Y
- 41.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 16.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.65%
ICLN vs. ISPY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 10.70% | 47.05% | -25.72% | -20.41% | -5.43% | -24.18% | 141.82% | 44.36% | -9.03% | 21.47% |
ISPY.L L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF | 44.63% | 7.85% | 17.69% | 41.44% | -32.64% | 8.19% | 41.44% | 30.69% | 7.98% | 23.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICLN and ISPY.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2015 | 0.36 |
The correlation between ICLN and ISPY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ICLN vs. ISPY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ICLN
ISPY.L
Utilities
-
Technology
Industrials
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
ICLN
ISPY.L
-
Technology
ICLN
ISPY.L
Industrials
ICLN
ISPY.L
Energy
ICLN
ISPY.L
-
Basic Materials
ICLN
ISPY.L
-
Financial Services
ICLN
ISPY.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
ICLN
ISPY.L
-
Communication Services
ICLN
-
ISPY.L
Consumer Defensive
ICLN
-
ISPY.L
-
Healthcare
ICLN
-
ISPY.L
-
Real Estate
ICLN
-
ISPY.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICLN vs. ISPY.L — Risk / Return Rank
ICLN
ISPY.L
ICLN vs. ISPY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICLN | ISPY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.27 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 2.27 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 5.90 | -0.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICLN vs. ISPY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICLN drawdown since its inception was -87.15%, which is greater than ISPY.L's maximum drawdown of -52.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLN and ISPY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICLN | ISPY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.15% | -52.67% | -34.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.42% | -18.30% | -5.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.27% | -27.67% | -14.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.16% | -39.42% | -17.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.75% | -39.42% | -27.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.47% | -4.06% | -46.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.45% | -15.99% | -50.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.78% | 7.06% | -0.28% |
Volatility
ICLN vs. ISPY.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a higher volatility of 11.54% compared to L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L) at 10.75%. This indicates that ICLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISPY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICLN | ISPY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.54% | 10.75% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.70% | 24.92% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.86% | 28.02% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.93% | 28.71% | -0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.43% | 25.06% | +2.37% |
ICLN vs. ISPY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICLN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ISPY.L's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICLN vs. ISPY.L - Dividend Comparison
ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while ISPY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.02% | 1.63% | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% |
ISPY.L L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICLN and ISPY.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICLN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for ISPY.L.
ICLN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while ISPY.L is Cybersecurity. ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while ISPY.L tracks ISE Cyber Security UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ICLN and 0.69% for ISPY.L.
Find the right allocation for ICLN and ISPY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer