PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICLN vs. ISPY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICLN vs. ISPY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ICLN is traded in USD, while ISPY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ISPY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICLN achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly lower than ISPY.L's 44.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ICLN has underperformed ISPY.L with an annualized return of 8.88%, while ISPY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.97% annualized return.


ICLN

1D
-1.25%
1M
-14.03%
6M
2.76%
YTD
10.70%
1Y
34.98%
3Y*
0.42%
5Y*
-3.25%
10Y*
8.88%
ALL TIME*
-3.76%

ISPY.L

1D
0.72%
1M
13.49%
6M
50.10%
YTD
44.63%
1Y
41.78%
3Y*
28.85%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
16.97%
ALL TIME*
10.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICLN vs. ISPY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
10.70%47.05%-25.72%-20.41%-5.43%-24.18%141.82%44.36%-9.03%21.47%
ISPY.L
L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF
44.63%7.85%17.69%41.44%-32.64%8.19%41.44%30.69%7.98%23.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ICLN and ISPY.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2015

0.36

The correlation between ICLN and ISPY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ICLN vs. ISPY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ICLN
ISPY.L

Utilities

36.5%

-

Technology

27.5%
97.3%

Industrials

24.4%
0.3%

Energy

8.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.5%

-

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

2.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

ICLN
36.5%
ISPY.L

-

Technology

ICLN
27.5%
ISPY.L
97.3%

Industrials

ICLN
24.4%
ISPY.L
0.3%

Energy

ICLN
8.8%
ISPY.L

-

Basic Materials

ICLN
1.5%
ISPY.L

-

Financial Services

ICLN
0.1%
ISPY.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

ICLN
0.1%
ISPY.L

-

Communication Services

ICLN

-

ISPY.L
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

ICLN

-

ISPY.L

-

Healthcare

ICLN

-

ISPY.L

-

Real Estate

ICLN

-

ISPY.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICLN vs. ISPY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICLN
ICLN Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ICLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICLN Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ICLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICLN Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

ISPY.L
ISPY.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ISPY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISPY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISPY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ISPY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISPY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICLN vs. ISPY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICLNISPY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.27

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

2.27

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.17

5.90

-0.73

ICLN vs. ISPY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the ISPY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICLN and ISPY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICLN vs. ISPY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICLN drawdown since its inception was -87.15%, which is greater than ISPY.L's maximum drawdown of -52.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLN and ISPY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICLNISPY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.15%

-52.67%

-34.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.42%

-18.30%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.27%

-27.67%

-14.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.16%

-39.42%

-17.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.75%

-39.42%

-27.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.47%

-4.06%

-46.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.45%

-15.99%

-50.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.78%

7.06%

-0.28%

Volatility

ICLN vs. ISPY.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a higher volatility of 11.54% compared to L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L) at 10.75%. This indicates that ICLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISPY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICLNISPY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.54%

10.75%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.70%

24.92%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.86%

28.02%

+1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.93%

28.71%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.43%

25.06%

+2.37%

ICLN vs. ISPY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICLN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ISPY.L's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICLN vs. ISPY.L - Dividend Comparison

ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while ISPY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
1.02%1.63%1.85%1.59%0.89%1.18%0.34%1.36%2.77%2.49%3.88%2.36%
ISPY.L
L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICLN and ISPY.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ICLN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for ISPY.L.

ICLN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while ISPY.L is Cybersecurity. ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while ISPY.L tracks ISE Cyber Security UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ICLN and 0.69% for ISPY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICLN and ISPY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer