ICLN vs. DBE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ICLN returned 11.99%/yr vs 12.03%/yr for DBE. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICLN charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.

Performance

ICLN vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICLN achieves a 40.54% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ICLN having a 11.99% annualized return and DBE not far ahead at 12.03%.

ICLN

• 1D: -2.78%
• 1M: 11.22%
• YTD: 40.54%
• 6M: 39.84%
• 1Y: 83.73%
• 3Y*: 8.92%
• 5Y*: 2.10%
• 10Y*: 11.99%

DBE

• 1D: 2.33%
• 1M: -5.45%
• YTD: 83.68%
• 6M: 74.95%
• 1Y: 84.41%
• 3Y*: 23.42%
• 5Y*: 19.66%
• 10Y*: 12.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICLN vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF	40.54%	47.05%	-25.72%	-20.41%	-5.43%	-24.18%	141.82%	44.36%	-9.03%	21.47%
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund	83.68%	-2.17%	2.96%	-12.14%	33.77%	57.56%	-25.91%	19.72%	-12.95%	5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between ICLN and DBE is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008	0.28

The correlation between ICLN and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ICLN vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICLN

ICLN Risk / Return Rank: 87
ICLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
ICLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
ICLN Omega Ratio Rank: 78
ICLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ICLN Martin Ratio Rank: 90

DBE

DBE Risk / Return Rank: 71
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 65
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICLN vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ICLN	DBE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.20	2.43	+0.77
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	2.96	+0.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.40	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.50	5.89	+1.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.35	11.53	+9.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ICLN vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICLN Sharpe Ratio is 3.20, which is higher than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICLN and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ICLN	DBE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.20	2.43	+0.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	0.67	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.43	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	0.09	-0.17

Drawdowns

ICLN vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICLN drawdown since its inception was -87.15%, roughly equal to the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLN and DBE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICLN	DBE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.15%	-86.69%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.22%	-14.41%	+3.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.18%	-23.89%	-19.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.16%	-38.74%	-18.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.75%	-60.84%	-5.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.13%	-30.27%	-6.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.61%	-57.31%	-9.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.94%	7.35%	-3.41%

Volatility

ICLN vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) is 9.53%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that ICLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICLN	DBE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.53%	12.95%	-3.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.21%	30.86%	-10.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.38%	34.97%	-8.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.21%	29.39%	-2.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.20%	28.33%	-1.13%

ICLN vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICLN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICLN vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than DBE's 2.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund	2.10%	3.86%	6.32%	3.87%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	1.79%	1.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF	1.16%	1.63%	1.85%	1.59%	0.89%	1.18%	0.34%	1.36%	2.77%	2.49%	3.88%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICLN and DBE in my portfolio?

ICLN and DBE have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICLN or DBE?

DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to ICLN (9.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICLN dropped -87.15% vs DBE's -86.69%.

Which ETF is better, ICLN or DBE?

On 10-year performance, DBE leads with 12.03% vs 11.99% for ICLN. On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, ICLN has been the lower-risk option at 9.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ICLN or DBE?

Over the 10-year period, DBE has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 11.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICLN or DBE?

ICLN is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ICLN or DBE?

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 1.16% for ICLN.

What is the main difference between ICLN and DBE?

ICLN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for ICLN and 0.78% for DBE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.