ICLN vs. CSH2.L
ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) and CSH2.L (Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while CSH2.L is a Money Market fund tracking the SONIA Compounded (GBP Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ICLN returned 8.88%/yr vs 2.36%/yr for CSH2.L. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICLN charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CSH2.L.
Performance
ICLN vs. CSH2.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ICLN is traded in USD, while CSH2.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSH2.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICLN achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly higher than CSH2.L's 2.06% return. Over the past 10 years, ICLN has outperformed CSH2.L with an annualized return of 8.88%, while CSH2.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.36% annualized return.
ICLN
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -14.03%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- 34.98%
- 3Y*
- 0.42%
- 5Y*
- -3.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.76%
CSH2.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- YTD
- 2.06%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.80%
ICLN vs. CSH2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 10.70% | 47.05% | -25.72% | -20.41% | -5.43% | -24.18% | 141.82% | 44.36% | -9.03% | 21.47% |
CSH2.L Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc | 2.06% | 12.57% | 3.85% | 10.24% | -9.32% | -0.78% | 3.37% | 4.86% | -5.00% | 9.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICLN and CSH2.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015 | 0.26 |
The correlation between ICLN and CSH2.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.36 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICLN vs. CSH2.L — Risk / Return Rank
ICLN
CSH2.L
ICLN vs. CSH2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICLN | CSH2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.12 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 1.09 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 2.35 | +2.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICLN vs. CSH2.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICLN drawdown since its inception was -87.15%, which is greater than CSH2.L's maximum drawdown of -29.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLN and CSH2.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICLN | CSH2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.15% | -29.83% | -57.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.42% | -4.11% | -19.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.27% | -7.81% | -34.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.16% | -22.77% | -34.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.75% | -24.10% | -42.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.47% | -1.07% | -49.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.45% | -12.59% | -53.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.78% | 1.91% | +4.87% |
Volatility
ICLN vs. CSH2.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a higher volatility of 11.54% compared to Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) at 1.72%. This indicates that ICLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICLN | CSH2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.54% | 1.72% | +9.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.70% | 5.07% | +19.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.86% | 6.66% | +23.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.93% | 8.54% | +19.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.43% | 8.81% | +18.62% |
ICLN vs. CSH2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICLN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH2.L's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICLN vs. CSH2.L - Dividend Comparison
ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSH2.L Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.02% | 1.63% | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICLN and CSH2.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSH2.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSH2.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ICLN.
ICLN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while CSH2.L is Money Market. ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while CSH2.L tracks SONIA Compounded (GBP Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ICLN and 0.10% for CSH2.L.
Find the right allocation for ICLN and CSH2.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer