PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ICLN vs. CNDX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ICLN vs. CNDX.L

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) and CNDX.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while CNDX.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ICLN returned 11.67%/yr vs 21.60%/yr for CNDX.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICLN charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CNDX.L.

Performance

ICLN vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICLN achieves a 27.33% return, which is significantly higher than CNDX.L's 16.86% return. Over the past 10 years, ICLN has underperformed CNDX.L with an annualized return of 11.67%, while CNDX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 21.60% annualized return.

ICLN

1D
0.87%
1M
-5.47%
YTD
27.33%
6M
27.01%
1Y
60.20%
3Y*
5.25%
5Y*
-0.21%
10Y*
11.67%

CNDX.L

1D
3.01%
1M
0.15%
YTD
16.86%
6M
18.12%
1Y
36.58%
3Y*
26.24%
5Y*
16.67%
10Y*
21.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICLN vs. CNDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF		27.33%47.05%-25.72%-20.41%-5.43%-24.18%141.82%44.36%-9.03%21.47%
CNDX.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		16.86%19.75%26.42%56.22%-33.49%27.92%48.25%37.96%-1.08%31.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ICLN and CNDX.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010

0.37

The correlation between ICLN and CNDX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ICLN vs. CNDX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ICLN
CNDX.L

Utilities

35.4%
1.1%

Industrials

26.2%
2.8%

Energy

24.9%
0.5%

Technology

10.8%
60.0%

Basic Materials

1.3%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
10.8%

Communication Services

-

13.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.4%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

3.6%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

ICLN
35.4%
CNDX.L
1.1%

Industrials

ICLN
26.2%
CNDX.L
2.8%

Energy

ICLN
24.9%
CNDX.L
0.5%

Technology

ICLN
10.8%
CNDX.L
60.0%

Basic Materials

ICLN
1.3%
CNDX.L
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ICLN
0.1%
CNDX.L
10.8%

Communication Services

ICLN

-

CNDX.L
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

ICLN

-

CNDX.L
6.4%

Financial Services

ICLN

-

CNDX.L
0.2%

Healthcare

ICLN

-

CNDX.L
3.6%

Real Estate

ICLN

-

CNDX.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with ICLN:
ICLN vs. TANICLN vs. QCLNICLN vs. GRIDICLN vs. INRG.LICLN vs. PBWICLN vs. CNRGICLN vs. LIT
Often compared with CNDX.L:
CNDX.L vs. QQQCNDX.L vs. EQQQ.DECNDX.L vs. SXRV.DECNDX.L vs. CNX1.LCNDX.L vs. CSPX.LCNDX.L vs. EQQU.LCNDX.L vs. VWRA.L

Return for Risk

ICLN vs. CNDX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ICLN
ICLN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ICLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICLN Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ICLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICLN Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
CNDX.L
CNDX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICLN vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ICLNCNDX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.17
2.17

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.73
3.03

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

3.24

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.84

11.35

+2.50

ICLN vs. CNDX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICLN Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICLN and CNDX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICLN vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICLN drawdown since its inception was -87.15%, which is greater than CNDX.L's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLN and CNDX.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ICLNCNDX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.15%

-35.21%

-51.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.38%

-11.00%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.18%

-22.44%

-20.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.16%

-35.21%

-21.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.75%

-35.21%

-31.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.03%

-3.08%

-39.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.56%

-5.13%

-61.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

3.15%

+1.26%

Volatility

ICLN vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a higher volatility of 12.97% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) at 6.21%. This indicates that ICLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ICLNCNDX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.97%

6.21%

+6.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.62%

12.72%

+9.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.21%

16.44%

+11.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.55%

20.99%

+6.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.32%

20.12%

+7.20%

ICLN vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICLN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICLN vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison

ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while CNDX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNDX.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF		1.28%1.63%1.85%1.59%0.89%1.18%0.34%1.36%2.77%2.49%3.88%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

ICLN and CNDX.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CNDX.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CNDX.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ICLN.

ICLN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while CNDX.L is Nasdaq-100. ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while CNDX.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ICLN and 0.33% for CNDX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICLN and CNDX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer