PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICLN vs. ALKS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICLN vs. ALKS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Alkermes plc (ALKS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICLN achieves a 28.34% return, which is significantly lower than ALKS's 58.54% return. Over the past 10 years, ICLN has outperformed ALKS with an annualized return of 11.52%, while ALKS has yielded a comparatively lower 0.70% annualized return.


ICLN

1D
0.80%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
28.34%
6M
28.17%
1Y
61.48%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
-0.17%
10Y*
11.52%

ALKS

1D
0.18%
1M
18.36%
YTD
58.54%
6M
57.47%
1Y
48.71%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
0.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICLN vs. ALKS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
28.34%47.05%-25.72%-20.41%-5.43%-24.18%141.82%44.36%-9.03%21.47%
ALKS
Alkermes plc
58.54%-2.71%3.68%6.16%12.34%16.59%-2.21%-30.87%-46.08%-1.53%

Correlation

The correlation between ICLN and ALKS is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2008

0.31

The correlation between ICLN and ALKS shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICLN vs. ALKS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICLN
ICLN Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ICLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICLN Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ICLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICLN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

ALKS
ALKS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ALKS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALKS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALKS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ALKS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALKS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICLN vs. ALKS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Alkermes plc (ALKS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICLNALKSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

2.21

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.82

5.11

+8.70

ICLN vs. ALKS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICLN Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the ALKS Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICLN and ALKS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICLN vs. ALKS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICLN drawdown since its inception was -87.15%, smaller than the maximum ALKS drawdown of -96.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLN and ALKS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICLNALKSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.15%

-96.14%

+8.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.38%

-22.20%

+5.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.18%

-31.58%

-11.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.16%

-33.18%

-23.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.75%

-80.58%

+13.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.58%

-54.76%

+12.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.55%

-67.23%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

9.55%

-5.09%

Volatility

ICLN vs. ALKS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a higher volatility of 12.94% compared to Alkermes plc (ALKS) at 10.43%. This indicates that ICLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALKS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICLNALKSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.94%

10.43%

+2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.57%

30.28%

-7.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.28%

40.79%

-12.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.55%

37.33%

-9.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.33%

41.31%

-13.98%

Dividends

ICLN vs. ALKS - Dividend Comparison

ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while ALKS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALKS
Alkermes plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
1.54%1.63%1.85%1.59%0.89%1.18%0.34%1.36%2.77%2.49%3.88%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICLN and ALKS have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICLN has higher volatility (12.94%) compared to ALKS (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICLN dropped -87.15% vs ALKS's -96.14%.

ICLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICLN and ALKS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer