ICHKX vs. FHKTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX).
ICHKX is managed by Guinness Atkinson. It was launched on Jun 29, 1994. FHKTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008.
Performance
ICHKX vs. FHKTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICHKX vs. FHKTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICHKX Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund | -2.77% | 28.97% | 0.05% | -14.52% | -23.67% | -6.90% | 14.58% | 30.08% | -20.50% | 49.07% |
FHKTX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M | 8.22% | 41.85% | 22.53% | -0.84% | -24.32% | -14.20% | 46.95% | 34.26% | -17.96% | 50.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICHKX achieves a -2.77% return, which is significantly lower than FHKTX's 8.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ICHKX has underperformed FHKTX with an annualized return of 4.00%, while FHKTX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.79% annualized return.
ICHKX
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -5.95%
- YTD
- -2.77%
- 6M
- -3.81%
- 1Y
- 13.55%
- 3Y*
- 1.41%
- 5Y*
- -6.79%
- 10Y*
- 4.00%
FHKTX
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- 8.22%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 45.66%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICHKX vs. FHKTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICHKX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FHKTX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICHKX vs. FHKTX — Risk / Return Rank
ICHKX
FHKTX
ICHKX vs. FHKTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICHKX | FHKTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 2.03 | -1.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.06 | 2.59 | -1.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.37 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 2.88 | -1.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.99 | 11.05 | -7.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICHKX | FHKTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 2.03 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | 0.10 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.54 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.31 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICHKX and FHKTX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ICHKX vs. FHKTX - Dividend Comparison
ICHKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than FHKTX's 1.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICHKX Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund | 1.09% | 1.06% | 1.11% | 0.74% | 0.86% | 20.44% | 3.57% | 4.37% | 12.53% | 6.76% | 5.31% | 12.25% |
FHKTX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M | 1.17% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.27% | 0.29% | 10.88% | 4.51% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 14.81% |
Drawdowns
ICHKX vs. FHKTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICHKX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, which is greater than FHKTX's maximum drawdown of -58.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICHKX and FHKTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICHKX | FHKTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.67% | -58.83% | -11.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.00% | -15.92% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.67% | -54.25% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.39% | -58.83% | +0.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.13% | -8.42% | -29.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.16% | -19.28% | -7.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 4.17% | -0.80% |
Volatility
ICHKX vs. FHKTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) is 5.50%, while Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX) has a volatility of 9.78%. This indicates that ICHKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHKTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICHKX | FHKTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 9.78% | -4.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.19% | 16.53% | -5.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.63% | 23.26% | -4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.71% | 23.99% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.40% | 22.11% | +0.29% |