ICHKX vs. FHKIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX).
ICHKX is managed by Guinness Atkinson. It was launched on Jun 29, 1994. FHKIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008.
Performance
ICHKX vs. FHKIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICHKX vs. FHKIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICHKX Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund | -2.77% | 28.97% | 0.05% | -14.52% | -23.67% | -6.90% | 14.58% | 30.08% | -20.50% | 49.07% |
FHKIX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I | 8.35% | 42.60% | 23.15% | -0.28% | -23.85% | -13.71% | 47.80% | 35.11% | -17.43% | 51.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICHKX achieves a -2.77% return, which is significantly lower than FHKIX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ICHKX has underperformed FHKIX with an annualized return of 4.00%, while FHKIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.46% annualized return.
ICHKX
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -5.95%
- YTD
- -2.77%
- 6M
- -3.81%
- 1Y
- 13.55%
- 3Y*
- 1.41%
- 5Y*
- -6.79%
- 10Y*
- 4.00%
FHKIX
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 46.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 2.95%
- 10Y*
- 12.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICHKX vs. FHKIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICHKX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FHKIX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICHKX vs. FHKIX — Risk / Return Rank
ICHKX
FHKIX
ICHKX vs. FHKIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICHKX | FHKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 2.06 | -1.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.06 | 2.62 | -1.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.38 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 2.94 | -1.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.99 | 11.29 | -7.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICHKX | FHKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 2.06 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | 0.12 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.57 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.33 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICHKX and FHKIX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ICHKX vs. FHKIX - Dividend Comparison
ICHKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than FHKIX's 1.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICHKX Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund | 1.09% | 1.06% | 1.11% | 0.74% | 0.86% | 20.44% | 3.57% | 4.37% | 12.53% | 6.76% | 5.31% | 12.25% |
FHKIX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I | 1.70% | 1.84% | 1.44% | 1.89% | 1.04% | 10.81% | 4.90% | 0.65% | 0.79% | 0.44% | 1.40% | 15.62% |
Drawdowns
ICHKX vs. FHKIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICHKX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, which is greater than FHKIX's maximum drawdown of -58.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICHKX and FHKIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICHKX | FHKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.67% | -58.42% | -12.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.00% | -15.90% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.67% | -53.83% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.39% | -58.42% | +0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.13% | -8.39% | -29.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.16% | -18.84% | -8.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 4.15% | -0.78% |
Volatility
ICHKX vs. FHKIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) is 5.50%, while Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX) has a volatility of 9.78%. This indicates that ICHKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHKIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICHKX | FHKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 9.78% | -4.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.19% | 16.55% | -5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.63% | 23.25% | -4.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.71% | 23.98% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.40% | 22.10% | +0.30% |