FCHKX vs. VIGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C (FCHKX) and Vanguard Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VIGIX).
FCHKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. VIGIX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on May 14, 1998.
Performance
FCHKX vs. VIGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCHKX vs. VIGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCHKX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C | 5.23% | 41.13% | 21.90% | -1.27% | -24.66% | -14.60% | 46.29% | 33.74% | -18.29% | 50.37% |
VIGIX Vanguard Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares | -10.39% | 19.44% | 32.68% | 46.77% | -33.13% | 27.27% | 40.19% | 37.26% | -3.34% | 27.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCHKX achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly higher than VIGIX's -10.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FCHKX has underperformed VIGIX with an annualized return of 11.00%, while VIGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.03% annualized return.
FCHKX
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -9.11%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 5.73%
- 1Y
- 42.37%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 1.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
VIGIX
- 1D
- 3.99%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- -10.39%
- 6M
- -9.19%
- 1Y
- 17.20%
- 3Y*
- 21.14%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- 16.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCHKX vs. VIGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCHKX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than VIGIX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCHKX vs. VIGIX — Risk / Return Rank
FCHKX
VIGIX
FCHKX vs. VIGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C (FCHKX) and Vanguard Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VIGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCHKX | VIGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 0.80 | +1.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.34 | 1.31 | +1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.18 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 1.11 | +1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.31 | 3.97 | +5.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCHKX | VIGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 0.80 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.51 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.75 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.44 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCHKX and VIGIX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FCHKX vs. VIGIX - Dividend Comparison
FCHKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than VIGIX's 0.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCHKX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C | 0.83% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 11.31% | 4.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
VIGIX Vanguard Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares | 0.45% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.15% | 1.40% | 1.31% |
Drawdowns
FCHKX vs. VIGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCHKX drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, roughly equal to the maximum VIGIX drawdown of -56.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCHKX and VIGIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCHKX | VIGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.14% | -56.95% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.97% | -16.51% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.57% | -35.62% | -18.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.14% | -35.62% | -23.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.88% | -13.17% | +2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.52% | -16.36% | -5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 4.64% | -0.49% |
Volatility
FCHKX vs. VIGIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C (FCHKX) has a higher volatility of 9.28% compared to Vanguard Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VIGIX) at 7.01%. This indicates that FCHKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCHKX | VIGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.28% | 7.01% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.44% | 12.74% | +3.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.15% | 22.99% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 22.36% | +1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 21.53% | +0.56% |