PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCHKX vs. CHILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCHKX vs. CHILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C (FCHKX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCHKX achieves a 37.99% return, which is significantly higher than CHILX's 14.73% return.


FCHKX

1D
2.70%
1M
4.31%
YTD
37.99%
6M
39.43%
1Y
78.06%
3Y*
30.09%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
14.30%

CHILX

1D
1.39%
1M
2.76%
YTD
14.73%
6M
15.97%
1Y
42.70%
3Y*
13.23%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCHKX vs. CHILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FCHKX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C
37.99%41.13%21.90%-1.27%-24.66%-14.60%46.29%35.12%
CHILX
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund
14.73%26.30%15.44%-12.29%-28.54%3.54%48.69%48.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FCHKX and CHILX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019

0.69

The correlation between FCHKX and CHILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCHKX vs. CHILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCHKX
FCHKX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FCHKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCHKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCHKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FCHKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCHKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

CHILX
CHILX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CHILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHILX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CHILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCHKX vs. CHILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C (FCHKX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCHKXCHILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.42

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.04

4.97

+2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.95

15.19

+5.76

FCHKX vs. CHILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCHKX Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is higher than the CHILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCHKX and CHILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCHKX vs. CHILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCHKX drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, which is greater than CHILX's maximum drawdown of -47.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCHKX and CHILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCHKXCHILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.14%

-47.73%

-11.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

-8.54%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.42%

-22.59%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.07%

-43.88%

-9.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-4.02%

+3.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.28%

-20.37%

-0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

2.79%

+0.86%

Volatility

FCHKX vs. CHILX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C (FCHKX) has a higher volatility of 10.46% compared to BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) at 7.27%. This indicates that FCHKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCHKXCHILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.46%

7.27%

+3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.69%

13.15%

+5.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.86%

17.44%

+5.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.52%

20.36%

+4.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.46%

21.87%

+0.59%

FCHKX vs. CHILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCHKX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than CHILX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCHKX vs. CHILX - Dividend Comparison

FCHKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than CHILX's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CHILX
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund
2.56%2.94%2.11%2.02%0.92%1.19%3.64%12.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCHKX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C
0.64%0.88%0.63%0.63%0.00%11.31%4.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCHKX and CHILX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCHKX has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to CHILX (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCHKX dropped -59.14% vs CHILX's -47.73%.

FCHKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCHKX and CHILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer