PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICF vs. TOLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICF vs. TOLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund (TOLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICF achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly higher than TOLIX's 8.74% return. Over the past 10 years, ICF has underperformed TOLIX with an annualized return of 5.54%, while TOLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.64% annualized return.


ICF

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
12.19%
6M
11.56%
1Y
11.29%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
5.54%

TOLIX

1D
0.85%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
8.74%
6M
9.17%
1Y
10.18%
3Y*
12.07%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
6.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICF vs. TOLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICF
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF
12.19%1.85%5.30%10.36%-26.12%44.17%-5.43%25.48%-2.55%4.90%
TOLIX
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund
8.74%12.73%11.98%1.93%-9.26%20.37%-1.90%29.21%-11.05%13.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ICF and TOLIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2008

0.68

The correlation between ICF and TOLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICF vs. TOLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICF
ICF Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ICF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICF Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ICF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICF Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

TOLIX
TOLIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TOLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
TOLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICF vs. TOLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund (TOLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICFTOLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.16

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

1.61

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.92

4.28

-0.35

ICF vs. TOLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICF Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the TOLIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICF and TOLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICFTOLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

0.90

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.44

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.42

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.44

-0.13

Drawdowns

ICF vs. TOLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than TOLIX's maximum drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and TOLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICFTOLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.74%

-42.68%

-34.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.20%

-6.05%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.25%

-14.51%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.74%

-25.01%

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

-35.19%

-5.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-4.91%

+2.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.18%

-7.12%

-7.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.29%

+0.59%

Volatility

ICF vs. TOLIX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund (TOLIX) have volatilities of 3.71% and 3.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICFTOLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

3.59%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

8.66%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

10.88%

+2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.91%

14.18%

+4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

15.91%

+4.67%

ICF vs. TOLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than TOLIX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICF vs. TOLIX - Dividend Comparison

ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than TOLIX's 10.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICF
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF
2.48%2.88%2.66%2.76%2.64%1.82%2.38%2.55%3.20%3.10%4.21%3.30%
TOLIX
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund
10.07%10.99%9.47%2.67%8.92%6.06%1.68%2.00%2.57%2.10%1.34%1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICF and TOLIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICF has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to TOLIX (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICF dropped -76.74% vs TOLIX's -42.68%.

TOLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICF and TOLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer