PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICF vs. SRVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICF vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICF achieves a 14.43% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 22.80% return.


ICF

1D
1.99%
1M
0.89%
YTD
14.43%
6M
13.92%
1Y
13.25%
3Y*
11.05%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
5.83%

SRVR

1D
2.51%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
22.80%
6M
23.13%
1Y
13.12%
3Y*
10.08%
5Y*
-0.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICF vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ICF
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF
14.43%1.85%5.30%10.36%-26.12%44.17%-5.43%25.48%5.08%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
22.80%-1.99%2.70%6.84%-31.90%22.31%11.99%41.98%-3.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ICF and SRVR is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.81

The correlation between ICF and SRVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ICF vs. SRVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ICF
SRVR

Real Estate

100.0%
66.4%

Basic Materials

-

0.8%

Communication Services

-

7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

3.8%

Financial Services

-

0.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

11.7%

Technology

-

6.8%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Real Estate

ICF
100.0%
SRVR
66.4%

Basic Materials

ICF

-

SRVR
0.8%

Communication Services

ICF

-

SRVR
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ICF

-

SRVR

-

Consumer Defensive

ICF

-

SRVR

-

Energy

ICF

-

SRVR
3.8%

Financial Services

ICF

-

SRVR
0.9%

Healthcare

ICF

-

SRVR

-

Industrials

ICF

-

SRVR
11.7%

Technology

ICF

-

SRVR
6.8%

Utilities

ICF

-

SRVR
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICF vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICF
ICF Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ICF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICF Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
ICF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICF Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICF vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICFSRVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.14

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

0.89

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

1.93

+2.68

ICF vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICF Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICF and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICFSRVRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

0.78

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

-0.02

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.31

0.00

Drawdowns

ICF vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than SRVR's maximum drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and SRVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICFSRVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.74%

-40.99%

-35.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.20%

-14.78%

+6.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.25%

-18.34%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.74%

-40.99%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-10.08%

+9.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.18%

-15.26%

+1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

6.83%

-3.95%

Volatility

ICF vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) is 4.22%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that ICF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICFSRVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

6.07%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.02%

13.31%

-3.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.70%

16.90%

-3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.93%

19.74%

-0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.59%

21.46%

-0.87%

ICF vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICF vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, less than SRVR's 2.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICF
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF
2.43%2.88%2.66%2.76%2.64%1.82%2.38%2.55%3.20%3.10%4.21%3.30%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
2.86%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICF and SRVR have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRVR has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to ICF (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICF dropped -76.74% vs SRVR's -40.99%.

On 5-year performance, ICF leads with 3.41% vs -0.32% for SRVR. On fees, ICF is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ICF has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ICF has performed better with a 3.41% return vs -0.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ICF is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SRVR.

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 2.43% for ICF.

ICF tracks Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ICF and 0.60% for SRVR.

ICF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICF and SRVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer