ICF vs. SPMD
ICF (iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF) and SPMD (SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICF is a REIT fund tracking the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while SPMD is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ICF returned 5.99%/yr vs 11.78%/yr for SPMD. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICF charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPMD.
Performance
ICF vs. SPMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICF achieves a 16.93% return, which is significantly higher than SPMD's 15.51% return. Over the past 10 years, ICF has underperformed SPMD with an annualized return of 5.99%, while SPMD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.78% annualized return.
ICF
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 15.91%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 5.99%
SPMD
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 15.51%
- 6M
- 14.03%
- 1Y
- 27.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
ICF vs. SPMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 16.93% | 1.85% | 5.30% | 10.36% | -26.12% | 44.17% | -5.43% | 25.48% | -2.55% | 4.90% |
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 15.51% | 7.44% | 13.91% | 16.48% | -13.13% | 24.76% | 13.46% | 25.19% | -10.34% | 15.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICF and SPMD is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005 | 0.60 |
The correlation between ICF and SPMD shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICF vs. SPMD — Risk / Return Rank
ICF
SPMD
ICF vs. SPMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICF | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.29 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 2.95 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.18 | 10.81 | -5.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICF vs. SPMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than SPMD's maximum drawdown of -57.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and SPMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICF | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -57.62% | -19.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | -8.86% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.25% | -24.08% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | -24.08% | -10.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.22% | -41.86% | +1.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.16% | -8.11% | -6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.41% | +0.48% |
Volatility
ICF vs. SPMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) is 4.74%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that ICF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICF | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 5.07% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.33% | 11.77% | -1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.94% | 15.91% | -1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 19.75% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 21.20% | -0.60% |
ICF vs. SPMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMD's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICF vs. SPMD - Dividend Comparison
ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than SPMD's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.38% | 2.88% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.21% | 3.30% |
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 1.21% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.47% | 1.64% | 1.24% | 1.30% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 5.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICF and SPMD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMD has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to ICF (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICF dropped -76.74% vs SPMD's -57.62%.
On 10-year performance, SPMD leads with 11.78% vs 5.99% for ICF. On fees, SPMD is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, ICF has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMD has performed better with a 11.78% return vs 5.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMD is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ICF.
ICF has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 1.21% for SPMD.
ICF is categorized as REIT, while SPMD is Mid Cap Blend Equities. ICF tracks Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while SPMD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ICF and 0.05% for SPMD.
SPMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICF and SPMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer