ICF vs. SFLR
ICF (iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF) and SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICF is a REIT fund tracking the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while SFLR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. ICF is passively managed, while SFLR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ICF returned 11.06%/yr vs 14.88%/yr for SFLR. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICF charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SFLR.
Performance
ICF vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICF achieves a 16.93% return, which is significantly higher than SFLR's 3.84% return.
ICF
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 15.91%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 5.99%
SFLR
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 3.84%
- 6M
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- 16.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICF vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 16.93% | 1.85% | 5.30% | 10.36% | 2.48% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 3.84% | 13.29% | 19.99% | 21.20% | 0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICF and SFLR is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2022 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ICF and SFLR has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICF vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank
ICF
SFLR
ICF vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICF | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.33 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 2.40 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.18 | 9.51 | -4.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICF vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than SFLR's maximum drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and SFLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICF | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -12.13% | -64.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | -6.79% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.25% | -12.13% | -5.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.22% | +2.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.16% | -1.75% | -12.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 1.71% | +1.18% |
Volatility
ICF vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) at 3.81%. This indicates that ICF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICF | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 3.81% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.33% | 7.29% | +3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.94% | 9.46% | +4.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 10.28% | +8.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 10.28% | +10.32% |
ICF vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICF vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison
ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than SFLR's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.38% | 2.88% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.21% | 3.30% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 0.32% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 1.16% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICF and SFLR have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICF has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to SFLR (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICF dropped -76.74% vs SFLR's -12.13%.
On 3-year performance, SFLR leads with 14.88% vs 11.06% for ICF. On fees, ICF is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, SFLR has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SFLR has performed better with a 14.88% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICF is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.
ICF has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.32% for SFLR.
ICF is categorized as REIT, while SFLR is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ICF and 0.89% for SFLR.
SFLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICF and SFLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer