ICF vs. DESK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ICF (iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF) and DESK (Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - ICF tracks the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index while DESK tracks the MarketVector US Listed Office And Commercial REITS Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ICF returned 11.29% vs 2.26% for DESK. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICF charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DESK.

Performance

ICF vs. DESK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF (DESK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICF achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly higher than DESK's 5.73% return.

ICF

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -0.92%
• YTD: 12.19%
• 6M: 11.56%
• 1Y: 11.29%
• 3Y*: 10.12%
• 5Y*: 3.01%
• 10Y*: 5.54%

DESK

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 6.07%
• YTD: 5.73%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 2.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICF vs. DESK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF	12.19%	1.85%	5.30%	15.52%
DESK Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF	5.73%	-10.42%	16.01%	18.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ICF and DESK is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023	0.69

The correlation between ICF and DESK shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ICF vs. DESK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ICF	DESK
Real Estate	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ICF vs. DESK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICF

ICF Risk / Return Rank: 25
ICF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
ICF Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
ICF Omega Ratio Rank: 22
ICF Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
ICF Martin Ratio Rank: 28

DESK

DESK Risk / Return Rank: 10
DESK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
DESK Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
DESK Omega Ratio Rank: 10
DESK Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
DESK Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICF vs. DESK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF (DESK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ICF	DESK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	0.11	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	0.30	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.03	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	0.09	+1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.92	0.19	+3.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ICF vs. DESK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICF Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the DESK Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICF and DESK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ICF	DESK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	0.11	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.41	-0.10

Drawdowns

ICF vs. DESK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than DESK's maximum drawdown of -28.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and DESK.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICF	DESK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.74%	-28.65%	-48.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.20%	-25.09%	+16.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.67%	-13.46%	+10.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.18%	-11.04%	-3.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	11.82%	-8.94%

Volatility

ICF vs. DESK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) is 3.71%, while Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF (DESK) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that ICF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DESK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICF	DESK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.71%	5.71%	-2.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.85%	14.45%	-4.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.57%	19.97%	-6.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.91%	25.68%	-6.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.58%	25.68%	-5.10%

ICF vs. DESK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than DESK's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICF vs. DESK - Dividend Comparison

ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than DESK's 5.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DESK Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF	5.09%	5.15%	3.78%	1.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF	2.48%	2.88%	2.66%	2.76%	2.64%	1.82%	2.38%	2.55%	3.20%	3.10%	4.21%	3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICF and DESK in my portfolio?

ICF and DESK have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICF or DESK?

DESK has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to ICF (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICF dropped -76.74% vs DESK's -28.65%.

Which ETF is better, ICF or DESK?

On 1-year performance, ICF leads with 11.29% vs 2.26% for DESK. On fees, ICF is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ICF has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ICF or DESK?

Over the 1-year period, ICF has performed better with a 11.29% return vs 2.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICF or DESK?

ICF is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DESK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ICF or DESK?

DESK has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 2.48% for ICF.

What is the main difference between ICF and DESK?

ICF tracks Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while DESK tracks MarketVector US Listed Office And Commercial REITS Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ICF and 0.50% for DESK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.