PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICCIX vs. FAOCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICCIX vs. FAOCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dynamic International Opportunity Fund (ICCIX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, ICCIX has outperformed FAOCX with an annualized return of 8.01%, while FAOCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.29% annualized return.


ICCIX

1D
0.49%
1M
6.51%
YTD
16.09%
6M
19.05%
1Y
33.98%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
8.01%

FAOCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
-2.15%
3Y*
7.84%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*
6.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICCIX vs. FAOCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICCIX
Dynamic International Opportunity Fund
16.09%26.98%2.33%10.95%-13.47%1.05%27.19%6.62%-14.22%23.57%
FAOCX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C
0.00%14.19%3.86%19.03%-25.22%17.97%13.77%26.37%-15.77%28.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ICCIX and FAOCX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between ICCIX and FAOCX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICCIX vs. FAOCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICCIX
ICCIX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ICCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ICCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FAOCX
FAOCX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
FAOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FAOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICCIX vs. FAOCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic International Opportunity Fund (ICCIX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICCIXFAOCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

0.94

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

-0.42

+3.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.82

-0.72

+11.54

ICCIX vs. FAOCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICCIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the FAOCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICCIX and FAOCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICCIXFAOCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

-0.34

+2.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.17

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.38

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.25

+0.24

Drawdowns

ICCIX vs. FAOCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICCIX drawdown since its inception was -28.83%, smaller than the maximum FAOCX drawdown of -60.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICCIX and FAOCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICCIXFAOCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.83%

-60.45%

+31.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.85%

-7.33%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.34%

-14.05%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.97%

-36.96%

+13.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.83%

-36.96%

+8.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.90%

+5.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.49%

-15.62%

+9.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

4.01%

-0.91%

Volatility

ICCIX vs. FAOCX - Volatility Comparison

Dynamic International Opportunity Fund (ICCIX) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX) at 0.00%. This indicates that ICCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICCIXFAOCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

0.00%

+5.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.56%

4.07%

+9.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

9.17%

+6.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.82%

16.72%

-3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.04%

16.69%

-2.65%

ICCIX vs. FAOCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICCIX has a 1.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOCX's 2.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICCIX vs. FAOCX - Dividend Comparison

ICCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than FAOCX's 8.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAOCX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C
8.26%8.26%0.40%0.00%0.00%2.22%0.00%0.51%3.72%3.07%0.12%0.00%
ICCIX
Dynamic International Opportunity Fund
3.52%4.09%7.11%2.35%1.28%0.88%0.80%1.71%1.97%1.60%1.90%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICCIX and FAOCX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICCIX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to FAOCX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICCIX dropped -28.83% vs FAOCX's -60.45%.

ICCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICCIX and FAOCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer