ICCIX vs. FHLFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ICCIX (Dynamic International Opportunity Fund) and FHLFX (Fidelity Series International Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ICCIX returned 6.64%/yr vs 8.65%/yr for FHLFX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ICCIX charges 1.62%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FHLFX.

Performance

ICCIX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dynamic International Opportunity Fund (ICCIX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICCIX achieves a 15.53% return, which is significantly higher than FHLFX's 9.07% return.

ICCIX

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 5.12%
• YTD: 15.53%
• 6M: 18.88%
• 1Y: 32.81%
• 3Y*: 16.54%
• 5Y*: 6.64%
• 10Y*: 7.96%

FHLFX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 2.55%
• YTD: 9.07%
• 6M: 12.20%
• 1Y: 21.13%
• 3Y*: 17.01%
• 5Y*: 8.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICCIX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ICCIX Dynamic International Opportunity Fund	15.53%	26.98%	2.33%	10.95%	-13.47%	1.05%	27.19%	6.62%	-4.18%
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	9.07%	31.96%	3.67%	18.16%	-14.17%	11.23%	8.09%	21.66%	-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ICCIX and FHLFX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018	0.90

The correlation between ICCIX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ICCIX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICCIX

ICCIX Risk / Return Rank: 52
ICCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
ICCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ICCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
ICCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
ICCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FHLFX

FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 28
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICCIX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic International Opportunity Fund (ICCIX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ICCIX	FHLFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	1.51	+0.66
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	2.16	+0.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.27	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	1.99	+0.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.85	7.47	+3.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ICCIX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICCIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICCIX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ICCIX	FHLFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	1.51	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.54	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.52	-0.03

Drawdowns

ICCIX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICCIX drawdown since its inception was -28.83%, smaller than the maximum FHLFX drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICCIX and FHLFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICCIX	FHLFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.83%	-33.58%	+4.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.85%	-11.37%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.34%	-13.62%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.97%	-29.36%	+6.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.84%	+0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.49%	-6.11%	-0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	3.03%	+0.07%

Volatility

ICCIX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

Dynamic International Opportunity Fund (ICCIX) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 4.66%. This indicates that ICCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICCIX	FHLFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.62%	4.66%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.55%	12.08%	+1.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.74%	14.86%	+0.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.81%	15.98%	-3.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.04%	17.64%	-3.60%

ICCIX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICCIX has a 1.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICCIX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

ICCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than FHLFX's 3.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	3.17%	3.46%	2.98%	2.86%	2.60%	2.47%	1.92%	1.95%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ICCIX Dynamic International Opportunity Fund	3.54%	4.09%	7.11%	2.35%	1.28%	0.88%	0.80%	1.71%	1.97%	1.60%	1.90%	2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICCIX and FHLFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, ICCIX and FHLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ICCIX or FHLFX?

ICCIX has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to FHLFX (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICCIX dropped -28.83% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.