ICAD.PA vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ICAD.PA (Icade SA) is a stock, while QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Over the past 10 years, ICAD.PA returned -2.98%/yr vs 9.45%/yr for QYLD. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ICAD.PA vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Icade SA (ICAD.PA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ICAD.PA is traded in EUR, while QYLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QYLD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICAD.PA achieves a -7.36% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 8.00% return. Over the past 10 years, ICAD.PA has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of -2.98%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.45% annualized return.

ICAD.PA

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.59%
• YTD: -7.36%
• 6M: -0.59%
• 1Y: -4.27%
• 3Y*: -6.67%
• 5Y*: -12.95%
• 10Y*: -2.98%

QYLD

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: 8.00%
• 6M: 8.91%
• 1Y: 21.01%
• 3Y*: 10.29%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: 9.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICAD.PA vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ICAD.PA Icade SA	-7.36%	16.64%	-20.80%	-2.03%	-30.74%	6.82%	-31.82%	54.83%	-14.36%	28.07%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	8.00%	-3.68%	27.23%	19.09%	-14.06%	18.67%	-0.24%	25.47%	1.48%	4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ICAD.PA and QYLD is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013	0.12

The correlation between ICAD.PA and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (3 years) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ICAD.PA vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICAD.PA

ICAD.PA Risk / Return Rank: 33
ICAD.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
ICAD.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
ICAD.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 30
ICAD.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
ICAD.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 35

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 85
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 89
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICAD.PA vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Icade SA (ICAD.PA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ICAD.PA	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.14	2.12	-2.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.03	2.86	-2.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.42	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.18	4.85	-5.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.39	16.36	-16.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ICAD.PA vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICAD.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICAD.PA and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ICAD.PA	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14	2.12	-2.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.46	0.60	-1.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.10	0.57	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.61	-0.56

Drawdowns

ICAD.PA vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICAD.PA drawdown since its inception was -74.64%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICAD.PA and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICAD.PA	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.64%	-27.40%	-47.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.06%	-4.35%	-13.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.24%	-23.12%	-14.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.47%	-23.12%	-39.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.62%	-27.40%	-41.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.87%	-1.16%	-59.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.99%	-4.79%	-29.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.47%	1.29%	+7.18%

Volatility

ICAD.PA vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Icade SA (ICAD.PA) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.94%. This indicates that ICAD.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICAD.PA	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.21%	1.94%	+3.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.58%	7.35%	+9.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.45%	9.96%	+13.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.93%	15.39%	+12.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.63%	16.64%	+11.99%

Dividends

ICAD.PA vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

ICAD.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.55%, less than QYLD's 11.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ICAD.PA Icade SA	10.55%	19.59%	21.06%	12.18%	10.44%	6.35%	6.38%	4.74%	6.47%	4.88%	5.50%	6.03%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.67%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICAD.PA and QYLD in my portfolio?

ICAD.PA and QYLD have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.