PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBZL.L vs. ICVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBZL.L vs. ICVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBZL.L is traded in GBp, while ICVT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICVT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBZL.L achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly lower than ICVT's 25.90% return. Over the past 10 years, IBZL.L has underperformed ICVT with an annualized return of 9.70%, while ICVT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.96% annualized return.


IBZL.L

1D
0.18%
1M
-12.01%
YTD
10.16%
6M
3.73%
1Y
36.12%
3Y*
9.39%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
9.70%

ICVT

1D
0.09%
1M
7.03%
YTD
25.90%
6M
22.56%
1Y
43.04%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
14.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBZL.L vs. ICVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBZL.L
iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist)
10.16%38.28%-26.04%25.61%32.04%-19.06%-16.73%15.40%3.61%14.78%
ICVT
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
25.90%9.68%12.54%9.59%-11.23%0.28%56.28%17.13%5.64%6.32%

Correlation

The correlation between IBZL.L and ICVT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2015

0.24

IBZL.L vs. ICVT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IBZL.L
ICVT

Financial Services

33.2%

-

Energy

18.9%

-

Basic Materials

13.7%

-

Utilities

12.7%

-

Industrials

10.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.2%

-

Healthcare

2.2%
44.8%

Communication Services

2.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
13.0%

Technology

1.1%
55.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

IBZL.L
33.2%
ICVT

-

Energy

IBZL.L
18.9%
ICVT

-

Basic Materials

IBZL.L
13.7%
ICVT

-

Utilities

IBZL.L
12.7%
ICVT

-

Industrials

IBZL.L
10.8%
ICVT

-

Consumer Defensive

IBZL.L
4.2%
ICVT

-

Healthcare

IBZL.L
2.2%
ICVT
44.8%

Communication Services

IBZL.L
2.0%
ICVT

-

Consumer Cyclical

IBZL.L
1.3%
ICVT
13.0%

Technology

IBZL.L
1.1%
ICVT
55.2%

Real Estate

IBZL.L

-

ICVT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBZL.L vs. ICVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBZL.L
IBZL.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IBZL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBZL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBZL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
IBZL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBZL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

ICVT
ICVT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ICVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ICVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBZL.L vs. ICVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBZL.LICVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.54

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

5.58

-3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.39

16.69

-9.30

IBZL.L vs. ICVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBZL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the ICVT Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBZL.L and ICVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBZL.LICVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

3.09

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.69

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.94

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.83

-0.63

Drawdowns

IBZL.L vs. ICVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBZL.L drawdown since its inception was -69.44%, which is greater than ICVT's maximum drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBZL.L and ICVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBZL.LICVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.44%

-25.13%

-44.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.58%

-7.75%

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.68%

-14.82%

-12.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.21%

-23.39%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.77%

-25.13%

-26.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.43%

-0.53%

-15.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.85%

-6.99%

-14.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.87%

2.59%

+2.28%

Volatility

IBZL.L vs. ICVT - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) have volatilities of 5.42% and 5.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBZL.LICVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

5.36%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.53%

10.84%

+6.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.29%

14.00%

+7.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.40%

12.99%

+13.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.47%

16.04%

+15.43%

IBZL.L vs. ICVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBZL.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ICVT's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBZL.L vs. ICVT - Dividend Comparison

IBZL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than ICVT's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBZL.L
iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist)
5.82%5.74%8.31%6.83%16.49%8.64%2.44%3.28%3.31%1.86%2.24%5.42%
ICVT
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
1.29%1.73%2.19%1.85%1.93%7.70%3.98%1.86%4.82%2.56%3.06%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBZL.L and ICVT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ICVT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ICVT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBZL.L.

IBZL.L is categorized as Latin America Equities, while ICVT is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. IBZL.L tracks MSCI Brazil NR USD, while ICVT tracks Barclays U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond > $250MM Index. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IBZL.L and 0.20% for ICVT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBZL.L and ICVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer