IBZL.L vs. ACWI
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI).
IBZL.L and ACWI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBZL.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Brazil NR USD. It was launched on Nov 18, 2005. ACWI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World Index. It was launched on Mar 26, 2008. Both IBZL.L and ACWI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBZL.L or ACWI.
Key characteristics
| IBZL.L | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -16.14% | 19.21% |
| 1Y Return | -11.49% | 27.06% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.47% | 5.91% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 0.06% | 11.26% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.20% | 9.44% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.69 | 2.55 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.89 | 3.49 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.90 | 1.46 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.65 | 3.68 |
| Martin Ratio | -1.15 | 16.66 |
| Ulcer Index | 11.35% | 1.79% |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.09% | 11.69% |
| Max Drawdown | -69.44% | -56.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -16.85% | -1.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBZL.L and ACWI is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IBZL.L vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IBZL.L achieves a -16.14% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 19.21% return. Over the past 10 years, IBZL.L has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 4.20%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 9.44% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBZL.L vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBZL.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBZL.L vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBZL.L vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
IBZL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.81%, more than ACWI's 1.58% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBZL.L iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) | 8.81% | 6.83% | 16.49% | 8.64% | 2.44% | 3.28% | 3.31% | 1.86% | 2.24% | 5.42% | 8.32% | 3.87% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.58% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.25% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% | 2.26% | 1.89% |
Drawdowns
IBZL.L vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBZL.L drawdown since its inception was -69.44%, which is greater than ACWI's maximum drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBZL.L and ACWI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBZL.L vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.11%. This indicates that IBZL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.