PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBZL.L vs. ICLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBZL.L vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBZL.L is traded in GBp, while ICLN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICLN values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBZL.L achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly lower than ICLN's 27.98% return. Over the past 10 years, IBZL.L has underperformed ICLN with an annualized return of 8.53%, while ICLN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.25% annualized return.


IBZL.L

1D
4.32%
1M
-6.39%
YTD
11.37%
6M
10.30%
1Y
33.52%
3Y*
6.71%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
8.53%

ICLN

1D
0.96%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
27.98%
6M
26.69%
1Y
63.36%
3Y*
3.13%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*
12.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBZL.L vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBZL.L
iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist)
11.37%35.97%-27.18%23.72%28.39%-20.69%-17.23%14.49%2.68%14.31%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
27.98%36.57%-24.42%-24.38%5.82%-23.46%134.72%38.87%-3.64%10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between IBZL.L and ICLN is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2008

0.37

The correlation between IBZL.L and ICLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (5 years) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IBZL.L vs. ICLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IBZL.L
ICLN

Financial Services

33.1%

-

Energy

17.9%
26.4%

Basic Materials

15.1%
1.1%

Utilities

12.0%
32.8%

Industrials

10.9%
27.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Healthcare

2.1%

-

Communication Services

1.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
0.1%

Technology

1.2%
11.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

IBZL.L
33.1%
ICLN

-

Energy

IBZL.L
17.9%
ICLN
26.4%

Basic Materials

IBZL.L
15.1%
ICLN
1.1%

Utilities

IBZL.L
12.0%
ICLN
32.8%

Industrials

IBZL.L
10.9%
ICLN
27.8%

Consumer Defensive

IBZL.L
4.6%
ICLN

-

Healthcare

IBZL.L
2.1%
ICLN

-

Communication Services

IBZL.L
1.8%
ICLN

-

Consumer Cyclical

IBZL.L
1.3%
ICLN
0.1%

Technology

IBZL.L
1.2%
ICLN
11.1%

Real Estate

IBZL.L

-

ICLN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBZL.L vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBZL.L
IBZL.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IBZL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBZL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBZL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
IBZL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBZL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

ICLN
ICLN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ICLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICLN Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ICLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICLN Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBZL.L vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBZL.LICLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.38

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

4.03

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

13.19

-7.26

IBZL.L vs. ICLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBZL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBZL.L and ICLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBZL.L vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBZL.L drawdown since its inception was -71.99%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -84.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBZL.L and ICLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBZL.LICLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.99%

-84.40%

+12.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.97%

-15.79%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.80%

-42.62%

+13.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.80%

-57.04%

+28.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.07%

-64.68%

+12.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.98%

-32.10%

+17.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.70%

-57.59%

+29.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

4.82%

+0.81%

Volatility

IBZL.L vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L) is 6.95%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 12.56%. This indicates that IBZL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBZL.LICLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.95%

12.56%

-5.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.60%

21.31%

-3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.76%

26.75%

-4.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.42%

25.64%

+0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.47%

26.28%

+5.19%

IBZL.L vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBZL.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBZL.L vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

IBZL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than ICLN's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBZL.L
iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.26%4.32%6.46%5.44%13.60%6.32%1.92%2.53%2.45%1.46%1.64%3.54%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
1.28%1.63%1.85%1.59%0.89%1.18%0.34%1.36%2.77%2.49%3.88%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBZL.L and ICLN have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ICLN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBZL.L.

IBZL.L is categorized as Latin America Equities, while ICLN is Alternative Energy Equities. IBZL.L tracks MSCI Brazil NR USD, while ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IBZL.L and 0.39% for ICLN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBZL.L and ICLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer