IBZL.L vs. ICLN
IBZL.L (iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist)) and ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBZL.L is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Brazil NR USD, while ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBZL.L returned 8.53%/yr vs 12.25%/yr for ICLN. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBZL.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ICLN.
Performance
IBZL.L vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IBZL.L is traded in GBp, while ICLN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICLN values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBZL.L achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly lower than ICLN's 27.98% return. Over the past 10 years, IBZL.L has underperformed ICLN with an annualized return of 8.53%, while ICLN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.25% annualized return.
IBZL.L
- 1D
- 4.32%
- 1M
- -6.39%
- YTD
- 11.37%
- 6M
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 33.52%
- 3Y*
- 6.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
ICLN
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 27.98%
- 6M
- 26.69%
- 1Y
- 63.36%
- 3Y*
- 3.13%
- 5Y*
- 0.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
IBZL.L vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBZL.L iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) | 11.37% | 35.97% | -27.18% | 23.72% | 28.39% | -20.69% | -17.23% | 14.49% | 2.68% | 14.31% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 27.98% | 36.57% | -24.42% | -24.38% | 5.82% | -23.46% | 134.72% | 38.87% | -3.64% | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBZL.L and ICLN is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2008 | 0.37 |
The correlation between IBZL.L and ICLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (5 years) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IBZL.L vs. ICLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IBZL.L
ICLN
Financial Services
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
IBZL.L
ICLN
-
Energy
IBZL.L
ICLN
Basic Materials
IBZL.L
ICLN
Utilities
IBZL.L
ICLN
Industrials
IBZL.L
ICLN
Consumer Defensive
IBZL.L
ICLN
-
Healthcare
IBZL.L
ICLN
-
Communication Services
IBZL.L
ICLN
-
Consumer Cyclical
IBZL.L
ICLN
Technology
IBZL.L
ICLN
Real Estate
IBZL.L
-
ICLN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBZL.L vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank
IBZL.L
ICLN
IBZL.L vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBZL.L | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.38 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 4.03 | -2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.94 | 13.19 | -7.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBZL.L vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBZL.L drawdown since its inception was -71.99%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -84.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBZL.L and ICLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBZL.L | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.99% | -84.40% | +12.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.97% | -15.79% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.80% | -42.62% | +13.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.80% | -57.04% | +28.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.07% | -64.68% | +12.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.98% | -32.10% | +17.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.70% | -57.59% | +29.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.63% | 4.82% | +0.81% |
Volatility
IBZL.L vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L) is 6.95%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 12.56%. This indicates that IBZL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBZL.L | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.95% | 12.56% | -5.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.60% | 21.31% | -3.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.76% | 26.75% | -4.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.42% | 25.64% | +0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.47% | 26.28% | +5.19% |
IBZL.L vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBZL.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBZL.L vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison
IBZL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than ICLN's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBZL.L iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) | 3.26% | 4.32% | 6.46% | 5.44% | 13.60% | 6.32% | 1.92% | 2.53% | 2.45% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 3.54% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBZL.L and ICLN have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICLN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBZL.L.
IBZL.L is categorized as Latin America Equities, while ICLN is Alternative Energy Equities. IBZL.L tracks MSCI Brazil NR USD, while ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IBZL.L and 0.39% for ICLN.
Find the right allocation for IBZL.L and ICLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer