IBUY vs. SILJ
IBUY (Amplify Online Retail ETF) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBUY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the EQM Online Retail Index, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBUY returned 10.38%/yr vs 10.08%/yr for SILJ. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBUY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.
Performance
IBUY vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBUY achieves a -10.92% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's 6.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IBUY having a 10.38% annualized return and SILJ not far behind at 10.08%.
IBUY
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- -10.92%
- 6M
- -10.14%
- 1Y
- -2.54%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- -11.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
SILJ
- 1D
- -5.24%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 16.40%
- 1Y
- 111.95%
- 3Y*
- 47.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
IBUY vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | -10.92% | 15.26% | 20.14% | 38.01% | -55.71% | -22.99% | 123.79% | 28.47% | -1.93% | 50.27% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 6.61% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -23.21% | 33.00% | 57.06% | -27.95% | -5.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBUY and SILJ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2016 | 0.26 |
IBUY vs. SILJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IBUY
SILJ
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
IBUY
SILJ
-
Communication Services
IBUY
SILJ
Technology
IBUY
SILJ
-
Industrials
IBUY
SILJ
-
Healthcare
IBUY
SILJ
-
Financial Services
IBUY
SILJ
Consumer Defensive
IBUY
SILJ
Real Estate
IBUY
SILJ
-
Basic Materials
IBUY
-
SILJ
Energy
IBUY
-
SILJ
-
Utilities
IBUY
-
SILJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBUY vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
IBUY
SILJ
IBUY vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBUY | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.32 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 3.24 | -3.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 7.99 | -8.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBUY | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | 2.05 | -2.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | 0.30 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.22 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.09 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
IBUY vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBUY drawdown since its inception was -73.00%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBUY and SILJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBUY | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.00% | -79.04% | +6.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | -34.71% | +11.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.87% | -34.71% | +5.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.15% | -55.47% | -15.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.00% | -70.06% | -2.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.29% | -26.80% | -25.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.65% | -41.43% | +11.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.50% | 14.06% | -3.56% |
Volatility
IBUY vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) is 5.60%, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 18.69%. This indicates that IBUY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBUY | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 18.69% | -13.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.70% | 45.24% | -29.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 54.90% | -33.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.07% | 44.35% | -12.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.16% | 46.24% | -17.08% |
IBUY vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBUY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBUY vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
IBUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than SILJ's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | 0.12% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 1.88% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBUY and SILJ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SILJ has higher volatility (18.69%) compared to IBUY (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBUY dropped -73.00% vs SILJ's -79.04%.
On 10-year performance, IBUY leads with 10.38% vs 10.08% for SILJ. On fees, IBUY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, IBUY has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IBUY has performed better with a 10.38% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBUY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.
SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.12% for IBUY.
IBUY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while SILJ is Silver. IBUY tracks EQM Online Retail Index, while SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IBUY and 0.69% for SILJ.
SILJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBUY and SILJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer