PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBUY vs. PAWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBUY vs. PAWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) and ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBUY achieves a -10.92% return, which is significantly higher than PAWZ's -13.86% return.


IBUY

1D
-1.83%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
-10.92%
6M
-10.14%
1Y
-2.54%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
-11.36%
10Y*
10.38%

PAWZ

1D
-1.17%
1M
-9.67%
YTD
-13.86%
6M
-13.78%
1Y
-20.63%
3Y*
-1.33%
5Y*
-8.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBUY vs. PAWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IBUY
Amplify Online Retail ETF
-10.92%15.26%20.14%38.01%-55.71%-22.99%123.79%28.47%-11.07%
PAWZ
ProShares Pet Care ETF
-13.86%1.21%3.88%12.47%-40.08%10.46%61.69%22.95%-9.71%

Correlation

The correlation between IBUY and PAWZ is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018

0.72

The correlation between IBUY and PAWZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IBUY vs. PAWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IBUY
PAWZ

Consumer Cyclical

71.7%
12.5%

Communication Services

5.8%

-

Technology

5.1%
4.1%

Industrials

5.1%

-

Healthcare

4.7%
32.3%

Financial Services

4.2%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
16.4%

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

4.5%

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

IBUY
71.7%
PAWZ
12.5%

Communication Services

IBUY
5.8%
PAWZ

-

Technology

IBUY
5.1%
PAWZ
4.1%

Industrials

IBUY
5.1%
PAWZ

-

Healthcare

IBUY
4.7%
PAWZ
32.3%

Financial Services

IBUY
4.2%
PAWZ
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

IBUY
2.5%
PAWZ
16.4%

Real Estate

IBUY
0.8%
PAWZ

-

Basic Materials

IBUY

-

PAWZ
4.5%

Energy

IBUY

-

PAWZ

-

Utilities

IBUY

-

PAWZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBUY vs. PAWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBUY
IBUY Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
IBUY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBUY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBUY Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IBUY Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBUY Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

PAWZ
PAWZ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
PAWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
PAWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBUY vs. PAWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) and ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBUYPAWZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.12

-1.25

+1.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.02

-1.77

+1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.80

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

-0.89

+0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.24

-2.16

+1.92

IBUY vs. PAWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBUY Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is higher than the PAWZ Sharpe Ratio of -1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBUY and PAWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBUYPAWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

-1.25

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

-0.44

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.12

+0.23

Drawdowns

IBUY vs. PAWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBUY drawdown since its inception was -73.00%, which is greater than PAWZ's maximum drawdown of -50.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBUY and PAWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBUYPAWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.00%

-50.07%

-22.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.23%

-22.31%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.87%

-23.12%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.15%

-50.07%

-21.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.29%

-42.69%

-9.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.65%

-22.55%

-7.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.50%

9.20%

+1.30%

Volatility

IBUY vs. PAWZ - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) and ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) have volatilities of 5.60% and 5.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBUYPAWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

5.80%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.70%

11.30%

+4.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.51%

16.61%

+4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.07%

20.18%

+11.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.16%

21.68%

+7.48%

IBUY vs. PAWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBUY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PAWZ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBUY vs. PAWZ - Dividend Comparison

IBUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than PAWZ's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IBUY
Amplify Online Retail ETF
0.12%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.54%0.29%0.00%
PAWZ
ProShares Pet Care ETF
0.88%0.81%0.63%0.44%0.54%0.18%0.14%0.35%0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBUY and PAWZ have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAWZ has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to IBUY (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBUY dropped -73.00% vs PAWZ's -50.07%.

On 5-year performance, PAWZ leads with -8.92% vs -11.36% for IBUY. On fees, PAWZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IBUY has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PAWZ has performed better with a -8.92% return vs -11.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PAWZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IBUY.

PAWZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.12% for IBUY.

IBUY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while PAWZ is Global Equities. IBUY tracks EQM Online Retail Index, while PAWZ tracks FactSet Pet Care Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IBUY and 0.50% for PAWZ.

IBUY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBUY and PAWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer