IBUY vs. EATZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IBUY (Amplify Online Retail ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. IBUY is passively managed, while EATZ is actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBUY charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

IBUY vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IBUY

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 3.20%
• YTD: -9.12%
• 6M: -9.86%
• 1Y: 2.17%
• 3Y*: 15.47%
• 5Y*: -12.18%
• 10Y*: 11.07%

EATZ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBUY vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF	-9.12%	15.26%	20.14%	38.01%	-55.71%	-27.97%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between IBUY and EATZ is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	0.69

The correlation between IBUY and EATZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IBUY vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IBUY	EATZ
Consumer Cyclical	68.1%	78.2%
Communication Services	8.6%	2.3%
Technology	6.0%	-
Financial Services	5.1%	-
Healthcare	5.0%	-
Industrials	4.9%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	16.9%
Real Estate	0.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IBUY vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBUY

IBUY Risk / Return Rank: 10
IBUY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
IBUY Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
IBUY Omega Ratio Rank: 10
IBUY Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
IBUY Martin Ratio Rank: 9

EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBUY vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBUY	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.10	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.29	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.09	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.20	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IBUY	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.33%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.75%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.99%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IBUY	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.65%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.52%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.87%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.13%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.18%	—	—

IBUY vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBUY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBUY vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

IBUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than EATZ's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF	0.12%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.54%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBUY and EATZ in my portfolio?

IBUY and EATZ have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IBUY or EATZ?

On fees, IBUY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBUY or EATZ?

IBUY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBUY or EATZ?

EATZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.12% for IBUY.

What is the main difference between IBUY and EATZ?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IBUY and 1.00% for EATZ.