IBTM vs. IBIT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IBTM (iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBTM is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the ICE 2032 Maturity US Treasury Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBTM returned 3.93% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. IBTM charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.

Performance

IBTM vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTM achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.

IBTM

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.15%
• YTD: -0.50%
• 6M: -0.81%
• 1Y: 3.93%
• 3Y*: 2.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIT

• 1D: -2.76%
• 1M: -18.50%
• YTD: -25.48%
• 6M: -29.84%
• 1Y: -38.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTM vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF	-0.50%	8.06%	0.29%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-25.48%	-6.41%	99.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTM and IBIT is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024	-0.00

Return for Risk

IBTM vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTM

IBTM Risk / Return Rank: 26
IBTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
IBTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
IBTM Omega Ratio Rank: 25
IBTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
IBTM Martin Ratio Rank: 26

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTM vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBTM	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	-0.89	+1.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	-1.23	+2.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	0.86	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	-0.79	+2.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.51	-1.36	+4.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBTM vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTM Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTM and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBTM	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	-0.89	+1.85
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.30	-0.10

Drawdowns

IBTM vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTM drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTM and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBTM	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.60%	-49.36%	+35.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.26%	-49.36%	+46.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.38%	-48.10%	+45.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	-16.02%	+11.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.12%	28.44%	-27.32%

Volatility

IBTM vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM) is 1.20%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that IBTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBTM	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.20%	9.50%	-8.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.75%	34.44%	-31.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.09%	43.73%	-39.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.56%	50.19%	-42.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.56%	50.19%	-42.63%

IBTM vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTM has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IBTM vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

IBTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF	3.95%	3.87%	3.96%	3.39%	1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBTM and IBIT in my portfolio?

IBTM and IBIT have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBTM or IBIT?

IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to IBTM (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTM dropped -13.60% vs IBIT's -49.36%.

Which ETF is better, IBTM or IBIT?

On 1-year performance, IBTM leads with 3.93% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IBTM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTM has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBTM or IBIT?

Over the 1-year period, IBTM has performed better with a 3.93% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBTM or IBIT?

IBTM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBTM or IBIT?

IBTM has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

What is the main difference between IBTM and IBIT?

IBTM is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. IBTM tracks ICE 2032 Maturity US Treasury Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTM and 0.25% for IBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.