IBTK vs. TLTX
IBTK (iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF) and TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. IBTK is passively managed, while TLTX is actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBTK charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TLTX.
Performance
IBTK vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTK achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than TLTX's 1.13% return.
IBTK
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 2.60%
- 3Y*
- 3.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.64%
- 10Y*
- —
TLTX
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTK vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBTK iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF | -0.34% | 3.33% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 1.13% | 6.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTK and TLTX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTK vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank
IBTK
TLTX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBTK vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF (IBTK) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBTK | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.95 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBTK vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTK drawdown since its inception was -22.84%, which is greater than TLTX's maximum drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTK and TLTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTK | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.84% | -6.35% | -16.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.87% | -2.62% | -7.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.55% | -2.29% | -10.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | — | — |
Volatility
IBTK vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTK | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02% | 9.26% | -6.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.78% | 9.26% | -2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.55% | 9.26% | -2.71% |
IBTK vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTK has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBTK vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison
IBTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than TLTX's 17.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTK iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF | 3.80% | 3.79% | 3.93% | 3.05% | 2.27% | 0.84% | 0.26% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 17.25% | 7.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTK and TLTX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTK is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTK is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TLTX.
TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 17.25%, compared with 3.80% for IBTK.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTK and 0.29% for TLTX.
Find the right allocation for IBTK and TLTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer