IBTK vs. IBTJ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF (IBTK) and iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ).
IBTK and IBTJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBTK is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 2030 Maturity US Treasury Index. It was launched on Jul 14, 2020. IBTJ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 2029 Maturity US Treasury Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020. Both IBTK and IBTJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBTK or IBTJ.
Key characteristics
| IBTK | IBTJ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 0.85% | 1.36% |
| 1Y Return | 5.56% | 5.48% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -3.52% | -2.36% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.89 | 1.04 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.31 | 1.53 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.16 | 1.19 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.24 | 0.28 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.66 | 3.17 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.86% | 1.54% |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.56% | 4.69% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.85% | -20.19% |
| Current Drawdown | -16.08% | -12.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTK and IBTJ is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IBTK vs. IBTJ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IBTK achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than IBTJ's 1.36% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBTK vs. IBTJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IBTK and IBTJ have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBTK vs. IBTJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF (IBTK) and iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBTK vs. IBTJ - Dividend Comparison
IBTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, which matches IBTJ's 3.92% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTK iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF | 3.90% | 3.06% | 2.26% | 0.84% | 0.26% |
IBTJ iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF | 3.92% | 3.48% | 1.85% | 0.74% | 0.61% |
Drawdowns
IBTK vs. IBTJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTK drawdown since its inception was -22.85%, which is greater than IBTJ's maximum drawdown of -20.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTK and IBTJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBTK vs. IBTJ - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF (IBTK) has a higher volatility of 1.30% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) at 0.96%. This indicates that IBTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.