IBTJ vs. WMB
IBTJ (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2029 Maturity US Treasury Index, while WMB (The Williams Companies, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, IBTJ returned -0.15%/yr vs 26.67%/yr for WMB. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
IBTJ vs. WMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTJ achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than WMB's 21.67% return.
IBTJ
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 3.40%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- —
WMB
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- YTD
- 21.67%
- 6M
- 22.42%
- 1Y
- 24.40%
- 3Y*
- 38.58%
- 5Y*
- 26.67%
- 10Y*
- 19.28%
IBTJ vs. WMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTJ iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF | 0.04% | 6.89% | 1.82% | 4.49% | -12.45% | -3.57% | 4.03% |
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 21.67% | 14.91% | 62.35% | 11.86% | 32.83% | 38.36% | 15.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTJ and WMB is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTJ vs. WMB — Risk / Return Rank
IBTJ
WMB
IBTJ vs. WMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBTJ | WMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.20 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 2.02 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 4.27 | +1.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBTJ vs. WMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTJ drawdown since its inception was -20.19%, smaller than the maximum WMB drawdown of -98.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTJ and WMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTJ | WMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.19% | -98.03% | +77.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.62% | -12.36% | +10.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.43% | -12.36% | +7.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.21% | -23.01% | +5.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.17% | -8.55% | +2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.71% | -27.07% | +17.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 5.82% | -5.23% |
Volatility
IBTJ vs. WMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) is 0.69%, while The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) has a volatility of 7.36%. This indicates that IBTJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTJ | WMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.69% | 7.36% | -6.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.58% | 15.58% | -14.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36% | 23.00% | -20.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.73% | 23.62% | -17.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.98% | 30.95% | -24.97% |
Dividends
IBTJ vs. WMB - Dividend Comparison
IBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than WMB's 3.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTJ iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF | 3.80% | 3.78% | 3.95% | 3.48% | 1.86% | 0.74% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 2.84% | 3.33% | 3.51% | 5.14% | 5.17% | 6.30% | 7.98% | 6.41% | 6.17% | 3.94% | 5.39% | 9.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTJ and WMB have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMB has higher volatility (7.36%) compared to IBTJ (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTJ dropped -20.19% vs WMB's -98.03%.
IBTJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBTJ and WMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer