IBTF vs. GGOV
IBTF (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF) and GGOV (iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBTF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index, while GGOV is a Global Bonds fund managed by iShares. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. IBTF charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for GGOV.
Performance
IBTF vs. GGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBTF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 2.14%
- 3Y*
- 3.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- —
GGOV
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 2.30%
- 6M
- -1.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTF vs. GGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 0.00% | 1.83% |
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 2.30% | -2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTF and GGOV is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTF vs. GGOV — Risk / Return Rank
IBTF
GGOV
IBTF vs. GGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBTF | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 6.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 59.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 269.70 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBTF | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | -0.11 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
IBTF vs. GGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTF drawdown since its inception was -10.45%, which is greater than GGOV's maximum drawdown of -4.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTF and GGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTF | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.45% | -4.69% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.50% | +1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -1.59% | -1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | — | — |
Volatility
IBTF vs. GGOV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTF | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36% | 5.38% | -5.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.38% | 5.38% | -3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.56% | 5.38% | -2.82% |
IBTF vs. GGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTF has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GGOV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBTF vs. GGOV - Dividend Comparison
IBTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 2.08% | 3.83% | 4.32% | 4.03% | 1.93% | 0.57% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTF and GGOV have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTF is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTF is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GGOV.
IBTF has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.
IBTF is categorized as Government Bonds, while GGOV is Global Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTF and 0.39% for GGOV.
Find the right allocation for IBTF and GGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer