IBTA.L vs. EIMI.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IBTA.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) and EIMI.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBTA.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while EIMI.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBTA.L returned 1.87%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for EIMI.L. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. IBTA.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EIMI.L.

Performance

IBTA.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTA.L achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than EIMI.L's 24.25% return.

IBTA.L

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 6M: 0.92%
• 1Y: 3.43%
• 3Y*: 4.23%
• 5Y*: 1.87%
• 10Y*: —

EIMI.L

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 4.51%
• YTD: 24.25%
• 6M: 27.21%
• 1Y: 49.41%
• 3Y*: 23.30%
• 5Y*: 7.61%
• 10Y*: 10.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTA.L vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IBTA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)	0.46%	5.30%	4.11%	4.15%	-3.75%	-0.64%	3.14%	3.58%	1.44%	-0.05%
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF	24.25%	32.16%	7.36%	11.03%	-19.67%	-0.65%	18.80%	16.37%	-14.17%	21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTA.L and EIMI.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2017	-0.01

The correlation between IBTA.L and EIMI.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IBTA.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTA.L

IBTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
IBTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
IBTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
IBTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
IBTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
IBTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

EIMI.L

EIMI.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
EIMI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
EIMI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 80
EIMI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EIMI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTA.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBTA.L	EIMI.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	2.56	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.61	3.42	+1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.47	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.62	3.88	+0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.47	14.02	+3.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBTA.L vs. EIMI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTA.L and EIMI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBTA.L	EIMI.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.80	2.56	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93	0.42	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.08	0.36	+0.73

Drawdowns

IBTA.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTA.L drawdown since its inception was -5.80%, smaller than the maximum EIMI.L drawdown of -38.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTA.L and EIMI.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBTA.L	EIMI.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.80%	-38.73%	+32.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.74%	-12.66%	+11.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.89%	-17.44%	+16.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.70%	-35.50%	+29.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-2.64%	+2.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-14.04%	+13.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	3.52%	-3.32%

Volatility

IBTA.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L) is 0.43%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that IBTA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBTA.L	EIMI.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.43%	8.18%	-7.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.86%	16.71%	-15.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23%	19.23%	-18.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.00%	18.31%	-16.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.76%	19.15%	-17.39%

IBTA.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IBTA.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IBTA.L nor EIMI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBTA.L and EIMI.L in my portfolio?

IBTA.L and EIMI.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IBTA.L or EIMI.L?

On fees, IBTA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBTA.L or EIMI.L?

IBTA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EIMI.L.

What is the main difference between IBTA.L and EIMI.L?

IBTA.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while EIMI.L is Emerging Markets Equities. IBTA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTA.L and 0.18% for EIMI.L.