PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBP vs. DBMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBP vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBP achieves a -13.35% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 11.44% return.


IBP

1D
-1.15%
1M
7.66%
6M
-25.81%
YTD
-13.35%
1Y
12.36%
3Y*
16.58%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*
20.72%

DBMF

1D
0.62%
1M
1.06%
6M
8.39%
YTD
11.44%
1Y
27.14%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBP vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBP
Installed Building Products, Inc.
-13.35%50.59%-3.53%117.57%-37.31%38.43%48.00%25.54%
DBMF
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
11.44%13.85%7.24%-8.94%21.61%11.49%1.80%10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between IBP and DBMF is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019

0.04

The correlation between IBP and DBMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (5 years) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBP vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBP
IBP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBP Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

DBMF
DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBP vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBPDBMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.44

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

4.47

-4.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.68

15.17

-14.49

IBP vs. DBMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBP Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBP and DBMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBP vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBP drawdown since its inception was -61.75%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBP and DBMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBPDBMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.75%

-20.39%

-41.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.70%

-6.10%

-36.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.70%

-15.60%

-27.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.38%

-20.39%

-27.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.70%

-0.87%

-33.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.01%

-6.52%

-10.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.21%

1.79%

+16.42%

Volatility

IBP vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) has a higher volatility of 13.15% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.82%. This indicates that IBP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBPDBMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.15%

2.82%

+10.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.30%

10.14%

+36.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.00%

12.64%

+42.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.05%

12.52%

+33.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.98%

12.39%

+36.59%

Dividends

IBP vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

IBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than DBMF's 5.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DBMF
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
5.10%5.91%5.75%2.91%7.72%10.38%0.86%9.35%
IBP
Installed Building Products, Inc.
1.49%1.23%0.80%1.21%2.52%0.86%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBP and DBMF have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBP has higher volatility (13.15%) compared to DBMF (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBP dropped -61.75% vs DBMF's -20.39%.

DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBP and DBMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer