PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBP vs. GFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IBP vs. GFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) and Griffon Corporation (GFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBP achieves a -13.19% return, which is significantly lower than GFF's 17.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IBP having a 21.23% annualized return and GFF not far ahead at 21.59%.


IBP

1D
-0.99%
1M
-2.33%
6M
-21.85%
YTD
-13.19%
1Y
9.34%
3Y*
15.91%
5Y*
15.01%
10Y*
21.23%
ALL TIME*
27.04%

GFF

1D
-1.97%
1M
-7.20%
6M
6.33%
YTD
17.59%
1Y
7.79%
3Y*
27.22%
5Y*
35.25%
10Y*
21.59%
ALL TIME*
3.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.01M$26.26M$31.76M
$88.43M$87.29M$109.43M

IBP vs. GFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBP
Installed Building Products, Inc.
-13.19%50.59%-3.53%117.57%-37.31%38.43%48.00%104.42%-55.64%83.90%
GFF
Griffon Corporation
17.59%4.42%17.97%83.96%36.91%41.60%1.83%97.74%-44.92%-21.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IBP and GFF is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2014

0.52

The correlation between IBP and GFF shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.67 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IBP:

$6.01B

GFF:

$3.95B

EPS

IBP:

$9.42

GFF:

$0.76

PE Ratio

IBP:

23.68

GFF:

113.38

PEG Ratio

IBP:

0.82

GFF:

1.47

PS Ratio

IBP:

2.05

GFF:

1.68

PB Ratio

IBP:

9.01

GFF:

41.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

IBP:

$2.95B

GFF:

$2.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IBP:

$997.90M

GFF:

$1.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

IBP:

$658.40M

GFF:

$245.38M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBP vs. GFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IBP
IBP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBP Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBP Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

GFF
GFF Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
GFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFF Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFF Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IBP vs. GFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) and Griffon Corporation (GFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBPGFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.07

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

0.26

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.59

0.67

-0.08

IBP vs. GFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBP Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is comparable to the GFF Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBP and GFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBP vs. GFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBP drawdown since its inception was -61.75%, smaller than the maximum GFF drawdown of -96.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBP and GFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBPGFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.75%

-96.84%

+35.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.70%

-27.85%

-14.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.70%

-27.85%

-14.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.38%

-39.02%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.75%

-61.32%

-0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.58%

-11.65%

-22.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.08%

-55.34%

+38.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.80%

10.70%

+9.10%

Volatility

IBP vs. GFF - Volatility Comparison

Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) has a higher volatility of 10.83% compared to Griffon Corporation (GFF) at 9.79%. This indicates that IBP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBPGFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.83%

9.79%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.96%

27.77%

+18.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.37%

37.36%

+17.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.09%

41.26%

+4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.02%

45.51%

+3.51%

Dividends

IBP vs. GFF - Dividend Comparison

IBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than GFF's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFF
Griffon Corporation
0.97%1.03%0.88%4.10%6.62%1.16%1.50%1.44%12.27%1.23%0.80%0.96%
IBP
Installed Building Products, Inc.
1.49%1.23%0.80%1.21%2.52%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

IBP vs. GFF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Installed Building Products, Inc. and Griffon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

IBP vs. GFF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Installed Building Products, Inc. and Griffon Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

IBP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Installed Building Products, Inc. reported a gross profit of 212.30M and revenue of 660.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.

GFF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a gross profit of 191.99M and revenue of 421.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.

IBP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Installed Building Products, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.60M and revenue of 660.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.

GFF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Griffon Corporation reported an operating income of 87.35M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.

IBP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Installed Building Products, Inc. reported a net income of 34.80M and revenue of 660.50M, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

GFF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a net income of 46.94M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IBP and GFF have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBP has higher volatility (10.83%) compared to GFF (9.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBP dropped -61.75% vs GFF's -96.84%.

IBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBP and GFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer