IBOT vs. VGT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IBOT (VanEck Robotics ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IBOT tracks the BlueStar® Robotics Index while VGT tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBOT returned 23.27%/yr vs 33.48%/yr for VGT. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBOT charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.

Performance

IBOT vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBOT achieves a 27.73% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return.

IBOT

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 8.89%
• YTD: 27.73%
• 6M: 28.82%
• 1Y: 57.26%
• 3Y*: 23.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VGT

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: 18.07%
• YTD: 31.64%
• 6M: 30.51%
• 1Y: 60.15%
• 3Y*: 33.48%
• 5Y*: 22.23%
• 10Y*: 25.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBOT vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF	27.73%	28.57%	6.39%	18.90%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	31.64%	21.77%	29.30%	28.09%

Correlation

The correlation between IBOT and VGT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2023	0.82

The correlation between IBOT and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

IBOT vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IBOT	VGT
Technology	51.0%	98.5%
Industrials	43.0%	0.4%
Energy	2.8%	0.3%
Consumer Cyclical	2.3%	0.1%
Healthcare	0.9%	0.0%
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Communication Services	-	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IBOT vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBOT

IBOT Risk / Return Rank: 74
IBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
IBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
IBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 72
IBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
IBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 74

VGT

VGT Risk / Return Rank: 76
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBOT vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBOT	VGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	2.95	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	3.63	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.47	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	3.69	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.10	11.77	+2.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBOT vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBOT Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBOT and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBOT	VGT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	2.95	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.19	0.68	+0.51

Drawdowns

IBOT vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBOT drawdown since its inception was -25.39%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBOT and VGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBOT	VGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.39%	-54.63%	+29.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.74%	-16.40%	-0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.39%	-27.23%	+1.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.07%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.48%	+1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.04%	-7.95%	+2.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.07%	5.13%	-1.06%

Volatility

IBOT vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) has a higher volatility of 7.25% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 6.39%. This indicates that IBOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBOT	VGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.25%	6.39%	+0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.59%	16.07%	+1.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.86%	20.57%	+1.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.09%	25.18%	-3.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.09%	24.60%	-2.51%

IBOT vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBOT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBOT vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

IBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than VGT's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF	0.30%	0.38%	2.81%	2.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	0.31%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.64%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBOT and VGT in my portfolio?

IBOT and VGT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBOT or VGT?

IBOT has higher volatility (7.25%) compared to VGT (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBOT dropped -25.39% vs VGT's -54.63%.

Which ETF is better, IBOT or VGT?

On 3-year performance, VGT leads with 33.48% vs 23.27% for IBOT. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 6.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBOT or VGT?

Over the 3-year period, VGT has performed better with a 33.48% return vs 23.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBOT or VGT?

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBOT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBOT or VGT?

IBOT and VGT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.30%.

What is the main difference between IBOT and VGT?

IBOT tracks BlueStar® Robotics Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBOT and 0.09% for VGT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.